Bukalov on the dimensionality of functions

[tcaudilllg]

Yeah well, when INTj and ENTp go off into their private little subjectivity zones, don't expect them to understand each other unless they're sharing the same zone. Boukalov seems to have done a good job codifying Gulenko's observations into a model (that's how Alpha works), but he needs to back off from expecting INTjs to understand his formulas....

Have you guys ever seen Bukalov's "Physics of Consciousness and Life" journal? It's far out.... Let's just say that he was so totally self absorbed with it, that it made my doubting of crosstype theory a difficult justification. He seemed a typeless wonder if ever there was one. What happens when you cross socionics with high energy physics? Anyone... hey, anyone? Hello?

Oh yeah, I just realized that positing that any number of electrons anywhere in space form a wave means that they are all the same particle and have precisely the same properties! (don't tell Buky, though he'd never believe it heh.)

[tcaudilllg]

Lol, I haven't checked out his journal yet but it sounds awesome.

Oh it's amazing dude... you never knew the Number 17 was so significant.... (I'm being sarcastic here. Very sarcastic.)

In sum, his "journal" purports to explain the entire universe, and then some. I would NOT take it seriously except as a case study of eh, Fe indulgence.

[Hitta]

OMG I wish I would have saw this earlier. With the vectors that is what I was trying to explain. The Dominant function is the most stable function in the ego, it leaks in to the unconscious though. The creative ego function leaks into the unconscious even more. The unconscious functions leak into the conscious as well.

[Hitta]

This is the model I used before



Thats what I think hes talking about when he talks about the vectors.

[Hitta]

[tcaudilllg]

On the Ne/Se thing:
I think Bukalov had by this point failed to distinguish the mathematical role of the superego, and attributed it to his own functions for all cases. (either that, or his example was ENTp specific.)

This is an unabashedly self-centric viewpoint on personality. Typical Bukalov.

I'd like to point out that it would appear my own observations on the role of the program function are consistent with his, save from a different angle.