Results 1 to 33 of 33

Thread: Baruch Spinoza (the Spinozist Guy)

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Logos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    5,407
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Baruch Spinoza (the Spinozist Guy)

    Another philosopher and another connection to be made with my past two. I have already shared my thoughts before about Spinoza being an INTj, so I am not going to bother with a blank slate guessing game. To copy and paste from the Famous INTjs (Redux) page.



    Baruch Spinoza: One of the forefathers of the Rationalist school of philosophy and often cited as the first modern pantheist.

    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Baruch (or Benedictus) Spinoza is one of the most important philosophers -- and certainly the most radical -- of the early modern period. His thought combines a commitment to Cartesian metaphysical and epistemological principles with elements from ancient Stoicism and medieval Jewish rationalism into a nonetheless highly original system. His extremely naturalistic views on God, the world, the human being and knowledge serve to ground a moral philosophy centered on the control of the passions leading to virtue and happiness.
    Wikipedia
    Spinoza's system imparted order and unity to the tradition of radical thought, offering powerful weapons for prevailing against "received authority." As a youth he first subscribed to Descartes's dualistic belief that body and mind are two separate substances, but later changed his view and asserted that they were not separate, being a single identity. He contended that everything that exists in Nature/Universe is one Reality (substance) and there is only one set of rules governing the whole of the reality which surrounds us and of which we are part. Spinoza viewed God and Nature as two names for the same reality, namely the single substance (meaning "to stand beneath" rather than "matter") that is the basis of the universe and of which all lesser "entities" are actually modes or modifications, that all things are determined by Nature to exist and cause effects, and that the complex chain of cause and effect are only understood in part. That humans presume themselves to have free will, he argues, is a result of their awareness of appetites while being unable to understand the reasons why they want and act as they do.
    Just some random website a biography:
    Baruch Spinoza was born to Portuguese Jews living in exile in Holland, but his life among the Marranos there was often unsettled. Despite an early rabbinical education, he was expelled from the synagogue at Amsterdam for defending heretical opinions in 1656. While engaging privately in serious study of medieval Jewish thought, Cartesian philosophy, and the new science at Rijnburg and the Hague, Spinoza supported himself by grinding optical lenses, an occupation that probably contributed to the consumption that killed him. Private circulation of his philosophical treatises soon earned him a significant reputation throughout Europe, but Spinoza so treasured his intellectual independence that in 1673 he declined the opportunity to teach at Heidelberg, preferring to continue his endeavors alone.

    Spinoza's first published work was a systematic presentation of the philosophy of Descartes, to which he added his own suggestions for its improvement. The Principles of Descartes's Philosophy (1663) contain many of the characteristic elements of his later work, but Spinoza seems to have realized that a full exposition of his own philosophical views would require many years of devoted reflection. In the meantime, he turned his attention briefly to other issues of personal and social importance. The Tractatus Theologico-Politicus (A Theologico-Political Treatise) (1670) is an examination of superficial popular religion and a vigorous critique of the militant Protestantism practiced by Holland's ruling House of Orange. Spinoza disavowed anthropomorphic conceptions of god as both logically and theologically unsound, proposed modern historical-critical methods for biblical interpretation, and defended political toleration of alternative religious practices. Christians and Jews, he argued, could live peaceably together provided that they rose above the petty theological and cultural controversies that divided them.

    Although he published nothing else during his lifetime, metaphysical speculations continued to dominate Spinoza's philosophical reflections, and he struggled to find an appropriate way to present his rationalistic conviction that the universe is a unitary whole. Respect for deductive reasoning and for the precision of the Latin language led Spinoza to express his philosophy in a geometrical form patterned on that employed in Euclid's Elements. Thus, each of the five books of Spinoza's Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata (Ethics) (1677) comprises a sequence of significant propositions, each of which is deduced from those that have come before, leading back to a small set of self-evident definitions and axioms.

    In Book I Spinoza claimed to demonstrate both the necessary existence and the unitary nature of the unique, single substance that comprises all of reality. Spinoza preferred the designation "Deus sive Natura" ("god or nature") as the most fitting name for this being, and he argued that the its infinite attributes account for every feature of the universe. Book II describes the absolute necessity with which the two attributes best known to us, thought and extension, unfold in the parallel structure that we, with our dual natures, comprehend as the ideas and things with which we are acquainted in ordinary life. This account also provides for the possibility of genuine human knowledge, which must be based ultimately on the coordination of these diverse realms. Spinoza's Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione (On the Improvement of the Understanding) (1677) provides additional guidance on the epistemological consequences of his metaphysical convictions. Here Spinoza proposed a "practical" method for achieving the best knowledge of which human thinkers are capable.

    Spinoza applied similar principles to human desires and agency in Books III-V of the Ethics, recommending a way of life that acknowledges and appropriates the fundamental consequences of our position in the world as mere modes of the one true being. It would be moral bondage if we were motivated only by causes of which we remain unaware, Spinoza held, so genuine freedom comes only with knowledge of what it is that necessitates our actions. Recognizing the invariable influence of desire over our passionate natures, we then strive for the peace of mind that comes through an impartial attachment to reason. Although such an attitude is not easy to maintain, Spinoza concluded that "All noble things are as difficult as they are rare."
    While none of the bold on their own merit would necessarily make him an LII, on the whole, they at least point to a narrow number of possible types that he could be. He could very well be an ILE, but parts of the bold seem to point to Spinoza at least being -valuing, especially the bit about his propositions "leading back to a small set of self-evident definitions and axioms," which mirrors closely the description of leading-Ti in the LII entry on WikiSocion.
    "Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
    Johari Box

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    /
    Posts
    7,041
    Mentioned
    177 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think Spinoza likes the Ti. A lot. He was also supposedly a very mild mannered sweet person if I remember correctly... quiet... introverted... I could see LII.

  3. #3
    Snomunegot munenori2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    TIM
    Introvert sp/sx
    Posts
    7,741
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    I think Spinoza likes the Ti. A lot. He was also supposedly a very mild mannered sweet person if I remember correctly... quiet... introverted... I could see LII.
    I'm sorry. Someone seems to be reading my mind.

    His work from premise to premise and all of his axioms embody my conception of what Ti is all about. He was like crazy logical.
    Moonlight will fall
    Winter will end
    Harvest will come
    Your heart will mend

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    /
    Posts
    7,041
    Mentioned
    177 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by munenori2 View Post
    He was like crazy logical.
    Dizzyingly so. I tried to read through the Ethics a couple years ago... I, um, have meant to get back to it...

  5. #5
    Logos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    5,407
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    Dizzyingly so. I tried to read through the Ethics a couple years ago... I, um, have meant to get back to it...
    Skimming philosophy sometimes proves to be just as fruitful as trying to figure it out at a slow pace line-by-line, as one may find that issue clarified or a missing piece provided at a later point.
    "Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
    Johari Box

  6. #6
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bassano del Grappa, Via Rodolfi 35
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    16,835
    Mentioned
    245 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yes, Ti-LII
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    /
    Posts
    7,041
    Mentioned
    177 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Logos View Post
    Skimming philosophy sometimes proves to be just as fruitful as trying to figure it out at a slow pace line-by-line, as one may find that issue clarified or a missing piece provided at a later point.
    That tends to be my reading pattern (skim the whole first, then sort of delve more and more into it... if I get there). I'm afraid my most severe issues tend to be lack of discipline and concentration, as well as not applying much effort. I think what deterred me with the Ethics was the specific/precise ways in which he was using words that I really needed to keep track of and wasn't willing to apply the effort to at the time. Usually in such instances I'll make a brief list/diagram so I can keep terms straight... but I didn't feel like doing that and then I set the book down meaning to get back to it... and I haven't yet...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •