What do you guys think Richard Pryor type was?
I'm guessing ESTp????
What do you guys think Richard Pryor type was?
I'm guessing ESTp????
Intuitive-logical Extravet (ENTP) most definatly.
As a side note, that thing that he did where he lite himself on fire is an EXTREME example of what can happen with an Si dual-seeking function.
What?! Not SLI?
ENTp
I thought that was a drug induced accident. Could you explain what you mean please?Originally Posted by Rocky
Topaz
The artifact which is the source of my power will not be kept on the Mountain of Despair beyond the River of Fire guarded by the Dragons of Eternity. It will be in my safe-deposit box. The same applies to the object which is my one weakness.
No, I don't think so. I don't really think he was any kind of introvert, actually. Besides, he also had a habit of taking on several different "roles" which is what Ne dominant people do. Also, the physical characteristrics...Originally Posted by Sycophant
Oh, and I saw that special on Comedy Central in which his wife was talking about him. She stuck out to me as an EIE, and I find it hard to believe that he would have married his conflict twice...
.. I guess people can argue why he did. But with Si as a dual-seeking function, it is said that people can find all sorts of with ways to either take care of their body or get some sort of sensations out of it that is almost "impure". Jung mentioned something like that in his desrciption of the Extraverted Intuitive type.Originally Posted by Topaz
OK, I'd like to point out that BrainTypes.com posted this two days after I said Richard Pryor was an ENTP.
http://braintypes.com/news_in_brief.htm#narnia
ENTj
BUMP...curious for new feedback.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
IEE
Last edited by 717495; 10-24-2011 at 09:34 AM.
POLI, thank God someone showed up for this
He looks like a feeler type. I can't put it together thought
Booty is just a ghetto expression, and I'm just a booty star.
Richard Pryor
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html