Kim: Thanks for your input (I have to admit, when I saw your name on the top of your post, I was prepared for an opinionated lecture on my lack of , but you pulled through :wink: ); it's good to have a genuine ENFp spin on it. You've provided probably the best reasoning I've seen yet (at least concerning my non-ENFp-ness; not sure how much this quite qualifies me as ENTp, though).
Joe: I think the "sloppiness" has to do with having less Ti; when contrasted with me, I think it's pretty clear that you're subtype, and I imagine that that's where the majority of our differences come from.
Blaze: Thanks...I guess?