View Poll Results: type of Donald Trump?

Voters
185. You may not vote on this poll
  • ILE (ENTp)

    3 1.62%
  • SEI (ISFp)

    3 1.62%
  • ESE (ESFj)

    3 1.62%
  • LII (INTj)

    2 1.08%
  • SLE (ESTp)

    119 64.32%
  • IEI (INFp)

    2 1.08%
  • EIE (ENFj)

    8 4.32%
  • LSI (ISTj)

    2 1.08%
  • SEE (ESFp)

    47 25.41%
  • ILI (INTp)

    2 1.08%
  • LIE (ENTj)

    8 4.32%
  • ESI (ISFj)

    1 0.54%
  • IEE (ENFp)

    2 1.08%
  • SLI (ISTp)

    3 1.62%
  • LSE (ESTj)

    5 2.70%
  • EII (INFj)

    4 2.16%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Results 1 to 40 of 1197

Thread: Donald Trump

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,955
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dalek Caan View Post
    Here's a description from Filatova from same quadra (whom I think self-types ILI?) -
    filatova was eii. she self typed as dii

    this is her on the far right top

    Socionics INFj EII Dostoyevsky Filatova portraits photos photographs visual identification type .png
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  2. #2
    Dalek Caan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    196
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beautiful sky View Post
    filatova was eii. she self typed as dii

    this is her on the far right top

    Socionics INFj EII Dostoyevsky Filatova portraits photos photographs visual identification type .png
    Oh, do you have a source? I think she has pretty good descriptions about Fi anyway. At least they match up pretty well with the people I know. Gulenko seems way too biased for me in that regard.

    edit: nevermind, I found it. http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?t...erina_Filatova heh, so that's why I like her Fi descriptions.
    Last edited by Dalek Caan; 01-07-2019 at 05:23 AM.

  3. #3
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,955
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    I have all her books
    Quote Originally Posted by Dalek Caan View Post
    Oh, do you have a source? I think she has pretty good descriptions about Fi anyway. At least they match up pretty well with the people I know. Gulenko seems way too biased for me in that regard.

    edit: nevermind, I found it. http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?t...erina_Filatova heh, so that's why I like her Fi descriptions.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  4. #4
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beautiful sky View Post
    filatova was eii. she self typed as dii

    this is her on the far right top

    Socionics INFj EII Dostoyevsky Filatova portraits photos photographs visual identification type .png
    Her profiles are much kinder than Vera's. Vera is ESI so her take on Gamma is probably more favorable than her take on some of the other quadras but she doesn't seem to hold back much, even on those in her own quadra.

    http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?t...ievskaya,_Vera


    Vera Izraylevna Stratiyevskaya - author of one the most popular sets of socionic type and intertype relationship descriptions in the Russian socionics community. She is known for producing some of the most detailed, lifelike descriptions of socionic types available at her blog socionika-forever. These thorough descriptions full of detailed behavior and more than a bit of irony have been machine translated and made available in English, but they are difficult to understand at times. However, quite a few socionists and socionics hobbyists have criticized Stratiyevskaya for portraying types of Gamma quadra in more positive light while exaggerating the weaknesses or peculiarities of types from other quadra. This is most likely explainable by her own type being ESI; thus, her depictions of types and intertype relations are said to be most accurate for Gamma types. Reading her profiles and intertype relationship descriptions pertaining to types from other quadra, especially Alpha, it should be kept in mind that she has written these from the point of view of an outside observer that does not provide a completely objective view. Stratiyevskaya self-types as ESI (suggested extended typing: ESI-Se so/sx 6w7).


    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •