ILE (ENTp)
SEI (ISFp)
ESE (ESFj)
LII (INTj)
SLE (ESTp)
IEI (INFp)
EIE (ENFj)
LSI (ISTj)
SEE (ESFp)
ILI (INTp)
LIE (ENTj)
ESI (ISFj)
IEE (ENFp)
SLI (ISTp)
LSE (ESTj)
EII (INFj)
I think people who changed to Trump SEE after finding out about Gulenko's opinion are like this basically:
"People just love to hop right on the trains/dicks of people who seem to be authoritative and intellectual due to their presentation and style of writing, and this can completely mislead those who don't have the ability to look deeper and detangle the logic on their own in order to understand the true implications of the content. Logical PoLR types in particular also LOVE to associate themselves with those who appear "intelligent" as a way to appear to have a leg up on how they present themselves as intellectual pariahs. I absolutely despise this about NT types and social attitudes in general."
I wrote the above in thehotelambush's blog post where he gave his typing of forum members. I think it applies to this situation really well.
You have gone senile then. Mr I don't date anyone who isn't 9/10. I am probably part of the reason you got banned before, although not intentional on my part. Remember now grandpa? You remind me of the drunk neighbor Donald Trump video since you loved to go after me when you were slobbering drunk. <3
He kind of resembles you.
Remember...
Ahh, I understand now, the booze killed off your last brain cells. I am sorry for your loss.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
no one said his Ti calculation was "wrong" just monstrous
turns out he was the best kind of correct (for winning the presidency--not necessarily best as for the country or even for himself--does he even want to be pres? doesn't seem like it. low fi)
SLEs are known for snatching "victory" from "impossible" conditions
if Melania was a better IEI maybe she could have pushed her agenda a little better (raise a heir, live in luxury, have sex with Trump no more than once a year), via feeling and informed him maybe no one wanted this. i.e.: just because you can doesn't mean you should, which Ti can have problems with
.
Last edited by dot; 02-17-2020 at 02:16 PM.
No he wasn't. That was some peoples opinions but that doesn't have anything to do with the rest of the opinions lol
Just think about it... Like 40% don't even vote... Apparently they didn't feel the need to vote so what would they have voted if they felt that need and what would that need have been if them not voting resulted in Trump winning
Soap..
theere ya have it
this is a real IEI in my mind (actually concerned about ethically closing out the excess of beta) vs someone like singularity (trying to selfishly ingratiate themselves to the hierarchy, in order to secure the benefits for themselves, often at everyone else's expense, all the while invoking the [mere appearance] of ethics in order to do so)
it really comes down to, from my point of view, the product of moral effort to develop at least some self awareness from the point of view of one's PoLR (in this case a measure of Te objectivity and self awareness)
Jung himself says psychotherapy could be effectively substituted by sufficient moral effort on the part of the neurotic and that's really all psychotherapy exists to do (facilitate said moral effort--to see oneself in a way that is difficult, in order to solve problems that arise out of failure to comprehend their origin and our role in creating them-- in other words to get out of our ego for one second--this move requires effort we call "moral"--because it entails an upfront sacrifice of "self" or ego--like Jesus says, "whoever would gain his life must first lose it")
Last edited by Bertrand; 06-01-2017 at 12:00 AM.
Well it is all out there for the forum to see if they choose to. Good thing I quoted you so much. You know everything I say is true. I could never forget your face and bug eyes.
FTR, I thought you were ok until you got drunk and went after me during one of your misogynistic rants.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
All he ever talks about is ethics (not that I really care about socionics or subscribe to it). This is great, these people are sick, the media is biased and corrupt, this person is a failure, we will be great again, blah blah blah... it's all ethics.
・゚*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:・゚
Yes... your binary system doesn't allow you to recognize that he uses ethics nonstop, because it seems a bit more Fe than Fi, basically. More proof that socionics is an autistic mess and should not be taken too seriously.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung