VI me, for great justice

[Exodus]

Definitely Gamma NT. I would say ENTj. You actually look a lot like Joy.

[cracka]

You actually look a lot like Joy.

Ah, i didn't wanna be the first to say it but yeah, i saw the resemblance right off the bat. In the first pic at least.

[Gilly]

Definitely Gamma NT. I would say ENTj. You actually look a lot like Joy.

Yup.

An obvious resemblance to the two female LIEs her on the board...unless she describes herself completely differently, I'm not sure we need much more

[Mona]

Hah.
I'm not an E. People drain me and I have a difficult time being around large groups of them. I tend to limit my conversations to those with close and trusted friends - the number of which, of course, I could count on one hand.

I agree with the N, but the T I have trouble agreeing with... I've always seen myself as F. I don't necessarily have trouble expressing my feelings in both verbal and nonverbal ways, but talking about them with people I don't know very well is somewhat difficult except if I know that what I say won't be dissected. I do like intelligent debates, but I tire of them, especially if it's a hostile environment. And while I don't like to be contradicted, I'm fairly patient with those who don't agree with me. If things get nasty (i.e.: name-calling, serious breaches of rationality when it comes to arguing), I've heard a lot of people say that my eyes flash (even that my eyes darken?), but I tend to say something sarcastic and satiric and leave it at that.

I write a lot, and usually it pertains to emotion. I'm a perfectionist and yet very insecure; I won a national scholarship for a short story (perfect score, etc) and yet I'm still very certain my writing voice is sub-par and naive.

Of course, I also have a bit of an inferiority complex which may skew, and I'm talking based on MBTI ideology, so I probably ought to go read more of the Socionics Wiki.

[Wittmont]

Hah.
I'm not an E. People drain me and I have a difficult time being around large groups of them. I tend to limit my conversations to those with close and trusted friends - the number of which, of course, I could count on one hand.

I agree with the N, but the T I have trouble agreeing with... I've always seen myself as F. I don't necessarily have trouble expressing my feelings in both verbal and nonverbal ways, but talking about them with people I don't know very well is somewhat difficult except if I know that what I say won't be dissected. I do like intelligent debates, but I tire of them, especially if it's a hostile environment. And while I don't like to be contradicted, I'm fairly patient with those who don't agree with me. If things get nasty (i.e.: name-calling, serious breaches of rationality when it comes to arguing), I've heard a lot of people say that my eyes flash (even that my eyes darken?), but I tend to say something sarcastic and satiric and leave it at that.

I write a lot, and usually it pertains to emotion. I'm a perfectionist and yet very insecure; I won a national scholarship for a short story (perfect score, etc) and yet I'm still very certain my writing voice is sub-par and naive.

Of course, I also have a bit of an inferiority complex which may skew, and I'm talking based on MBTI ideology, so I probably ought to go read more of the Socionics Wiki.

ISFj is not a bad shout then. You both look and sound like an ESI I know. That "serious breach of rationality" part made me Lol

[Slacker]

I'm not a big fan of VI, but I have to admit that you look a LOT like a younger Joy. A LOT.

Maybe VI is pointing toward Gamma then? Looking like someone doesn't make you the same type. It could point toward or away from some direction.

[Expat]

Hah.
I'm not an E. People drain me and I have a difficult time being around large groups of them. I tend to limit my conversations to those with close and trusted friends - the number of which, of course, I could count on one hand.

In Socionics, that points toward Gamma and Delta, not "I".

I agree with the N, but the T I have trouble agreeing with... I've always seen myself as F. I don't necessarily have trouble expressing my feelings in both verbal and nonverbal ways, but talking about them with people I don't know very well is somewhat difficult except if I know that what I say won't be dissected. I do like intelligent debates, but I tire of them, especially if it's a hostile environment. And while I don't like to be contradicted, I'm fairly patient with those who don't agree with me. If things get nasty (i.e.: name-calling, serious breaches of rationality when it comes to arguing), I've heard a lot of people say that my eyes flash (even that my eyes darken?), but I tend to say something sarcastic and satiric and leave it at that.

I write a lot, and usually it pertains to emotion. I'm a perfectionist and yet very insecure; I won a national scholarship for a short story (perfect score, etc) and yet I'm still very certain my writing voice is sub-par and naive.

Of course, I also have a bit of an inferiority complex which may skew, and I'm talking based on MBTI ideology, so I probably ought to go read more of the Socionics Wiki.

Then perhaps ESI, but I think Gamma is very obvious.

[Mona]

Interesting responses, all. So far, I've been typed all over the board based on VI. Ah well, I've had more identity crises than I can recall. What's another one?

For those who type me Gamma, from reading the Socionics Wiki I can probably see why.

Laughter and very obvious displays of emotion are subdued, instead, there is a lot of smiling, amusement with ironic and witty remarks or, when serious subjects or not very happy personal experiences are discussed, a serious demeanour. Even such small groups tend to split into smaller ones; perhaps 3 is the ideal "group" size for Gammas.

On the other hand, I looked at the Delta page on the Wiki.

Delta types reject dramatism and emotional affect in favor of wry humor and understatement.

That is me. I went on to read the EII page on the Socionics Wiki, and it appears to describe me very aptly. These are parts that describe me very well:

The EII does not like to be contradicted, and will often quietly mock those who confront her, but always with a smile.

EIIs have a great admiration for people who are able to get things done neatly and efficiently in the outside world. They themselves consistently forget to consider whether their activities are actually achieving their intended goal, whether their time spent is bringing worthy proceeds, and whether their activities are organized in the most rational way. They subconsciously expect and appreciate it when others take interest in the effectiveness of their activities and helps to take an objective look at what they are doing.

While at a party, the EII is likely to cling to the individual they are most comfortable being around.

The individual is quite adept at following discussions on the developments of present trends into the future and at contributing to them on occasion if he feels so inclined, but he does not take that as seriously compared to investigating possibilities in the areas he is interested in at present. He usually dismisses supernatural claims as being silly, wishful thinking, unless they happen to be related to the very specific religion he feels inclined to believe in and which he may be inclined to make part of his leisure activities.

I'm curious, however, what bearing does the content of my signature have on my personality? It would seem more logical that someone can be better described/typed based on something they themselves say, over a quote from someone like Churchill, Chesterton, or McCartney...

[Expat]

Have you looked at the bits referring to Extraverted Sensing in EII? Do they also fit you? Because what you listed is also consistent with ESI.

[Mona]

Have you looked at the bits referring to Extraverted Sensing in EII? Do they also fit you? Because what you listed is also consistent with ESI.

You mean this? EIIs are typically negligent of their surroundings and have difficulty keeping track of objects or constantly monitoring things and people around them. Yes. It fits me well. I have a habit of losing track of things, but I have lately forced myself to keep track of where they are because I feel that people feel that I'm incompetent/incapable of taking care of an object if I can't find something.

I lose my environment often, too. I can sit down and do something - almost anything, reading a book, listening to music, working with my hands, writing, watch a movie - and lose half the day doing so. The computer has been like that for me; I spend hours upon hours doing nearly anything.

Outsiders often think the EII is oblivious to reality because they will often neglecting basic needs.

My mother seems to pick on that. (She says she's an MBTI INFJ, somehow.)

[implied]

I'm curious, however, what bearing does the content of my signature have on my personality? It would seem more logical that someone can be better described/typed based on something they themselves say, over a quote from someone like Churchill, Chesterton, or McCartney...

again, this is a weird correlation and nothing to bank on in typing someone, but i do think g.k. is gamma, most likely INTp. (fwiw, i also considered that he could be INFj. he's a Fi valuer, i think?)