Ni-IEI is my best guess, I think. She seems Aristocratic to me; couldn't tell you why.
Ni-IEI is my best guess, I think. She seems Aristocratic to me; couldn't tell you why.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
it's kinda what i thought, too, even before reading this.Originally Posted by Gilly
implied gets along with everybody, classic IEI.
ILE
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
Yeah, after the last 2 conversations I had with Implied, IEI makes tremendous sense.
It is quite humorous that some people think we are activity partners.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
i don't know who has stated that we are "activity partners." this should obviously make me a Fi-IJ, then. i don't think we're activity partners, something less agreeable makes more sense. it seems as though the common perception of you here is INTj or ISTj, and i'm not particularly inclined to disagree.
Last edited by implied; 01-04-2008 at 12:42 AM.
An ISTj's activity partner is INFp.
Do you really see yourself as rational and IJ, though?
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
i could always say, "you don't know me! you don't know what i'm like outside this forum!" or pose the same question of you and your supposed EJ-ness.
sunshine/blaze -- i find that quite a compliment that you think i get along with everyone. ti usually do get along with people who make any attempt at all to get along with me. the ones i don't get along with are usually pretty unreasonable or generally "crazy." with real ESTjs, i haven't had that much trouble. i did post a pretty long description of my brother who i had suspected as delta and likely ESTj. we have a great relationship (in fact, i'll probably go to costa rica with him soon.) i still talk to this one great ESTj lawyer i know -- i tutored him in spanish a few summers back. excellent, excellent student & extremely competent in everything -- what he wasn't good at, he was willing to take the time to learn. i think my main issue with him was that he was fairly critical/pushy with his kids. but i don't think it was without good reason.
Last edited by implied; 01-04-2008 at 12:25 PM.
Ok..... but what does that matter? I am not making any statements about you, in that last post.
The difference is I am not telling you what type you are, I asked you a question - what you thought about your type. I am not saying I know you well enough, I am not saying what your type is either - I am asking you. I am not telling you, or saying without a doubt I know you are this or that.
I am asking you.
If so - how so?Do you really see yourself as rational and IJ, though?
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
