They make a pill for that you know.Originally Posted by maizemedley
INTj
INFj
ENFj
ENTj
ENTp
ESTj
ISFp
ENFp
They make a pill for that you know.
=)
fdjkhfas
I agree with Ishy. I tend to get along VERY well with INFps. The way you're ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN of everything you say makes me think you're an xxFj of sorts.
No offense, Joy, but I guarantee you and this INFp would NEVER get along. Thank goodness I only know you through the internet. I'd have laid you out mega times by now and told you to "get over yourself!"
You're just not my type!
OMG! Now where am I going to hide!
<--- Me pouring out all my love on you!
Some days its just not worth chewing through the restraints.
Thank you Artemis, your post reminded me of something. http://the16types.info/forums/viewto...=1772&start=15
<--- Me pouring out all my love on you!
Some days its just not worth chewing through the restraints.
=)
=)
=)
gjkldsklsfd
It's obvious you had too high expectations compared to how meticulous your experience was. The line between the two, to be measured accurately requires more people than there are on this forum as to really see a constant being defined, you have to rely on type because there's not a definition that is as clear regarding unique qualities. With the relatively low sample of people on the forum, one could argue without being unrealistic that unique qualities and current circumstances weight more in the majority of answers. I even think that for some types, it's possible that no constant on that matter will be collected. Your idea was interesting though, only unrealistic.
I guess you saw that one coming, but again, it depends on the "analyst"'s capacity of being more objective. Examples of elements that might alter this piece of data are type, emotionnal circumstances, ability to handle "cold" logic, among other things."Knowing someone personally," isn't enough either because we are THAT much MORE biased.
They are our friends, our confidants, our pals, and we have a perception of them.
This method also wasn't able to differentiate between functions at play or unique differences at play.
Are you implying your judgement about similarities are better than discojoe's ones? He clearly stated how with his capacity to differenciate himself from people he saw how he was similar to Joy. If you're willing to include type peculiarities as arguments, i suggest you might think you see clearer than other people, thus discarding discojoe's opinion without including his methods in what you said you consider as a valid way of spotting the differences (this implies strengths) between other people. To an observer like me, it sounds dishonest to say the least.I'm 100% sure I'm INFP.
I haven't taken the functions test.
I haven't taken any test.
Instead, I see people, I observe people, I hear people, I feel people...and I'm able to differentiate myself from people.
I'm not like...Disco Jo, Joy, Kim, Cone, Megan, Darklord, Sycophant, Rocky etc. etc..
My weaknesses, strengths are different from these people in distinct ways.
Is there a way to pin-point all the ways we're different?
Well, the fine folks at socionics are trying to put all this together.
But it's up to people to see the functional information and identify their weaknesses and strengths properly.
I think you just proved what i said above about considering your type in the equation, in that you claim that since you're INFp, and that you divulge what you perceive, it means it must be true. All i see in this assumption is a tactic to prove what you perceive as your special opinion without actually having to emphasize the "original" feeling you have about yourself.BTW, an INFp who feels confident enough to divulge what they perceive/understand is a rarity.
I'd never do this if I wasn't seeing/feeling/hearing a REAL perceived difference in functions between myself/Disco Jo/Joy.
Prove it? I tried an intertype experiment, it didn't work, it was inconclusive. Others try tests, others ask people to try and type them...etc. etc.
While i certainly don't consider you're the only person who needs the medicine you just prescribed, i think you should try to apply it to yourself and try to analyze objectively, without considering how special you think your feeling about it is.The solution? Know yourself and others. Have the courage to look at your real, true, inherent, weaknesses/strengths and have the courage to look at other peoples real, true, inherent weaknesses/strengths.
Also, don't forget you compare a male and a female ENTp. Female ENTps image concern may be way more apparent (or maybe apparent in a more traditional form) than male's one. Only, they will always surprise you with their ENTp goofiness along the way. I know a female ENTp that has similarities with Joy. She's the president of the student's association of her school and is good at it, only, when you dig deeper, she's mystified as to how she got that position and she even doubt about her competency to accomplish the task. She's not that always profound, always scientific girl neither, she has more of a politician vibe to her. Actually, your intuition about female ENTps and ESTjs is not that bad, in that i can see it through the use ofto guide their rationnality through status, mimicking
.
=)
Someone needs tp change the topic to:
138 Posts About Nothing
This fourm is getting so annoying. You can’t learn anything you have to wade around junk posts like “Fun fo yo” and this one. Yeah…
hjkghg
=)
jhklfd
=)
There's an ocean between attention and his cock
sycophant and i agree. I also liked how noone paid any heed to what i said.
Detail, i think the experiment got out of hand not but because maize is an irrational type but because everyone is being irrational.
*no one
maizemedley, you crossed the line for me when you started talking like you knew more about my relations with other board members than you possibly could, presumed to know my level of intelligence, presumed you that you could understand me, and convinced other board members that I am a type I very obviously am not. Mainly the first three.
I apologize... I just split up with my husband last night and I can't objectively see myself being... um... objective.
Maizemedley, stop supervising Discojoe and Joy.
she would be our illusionary actually
She said she confused MBTI and Socionics and that she's actually INFj.
oh
lol, now THAT makes sense! I thought she was a j!!!!
It kinda turned me on.Maizemedley, stop supervising Discojoe and Joy.
=)
I know this wasn't for me, but...So, when do you get to a point where you KNOW something...How does that feel to you? How is knowing experienced by you? Is most everything you know based on objective reasoning? Sorry to be so nosy!I'm just curious how you come to know things.
Factual research, gathering of data, etc... leads to making logical conclusions. Also, just being "seperated" from the personal point of view helps. You try to reason things based off of the facts you have, not how you feel about someone.
=)
I SAY ENTp
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
