No you didn't. This is the first time you even mention 3rd tier on this thread. Don't try to deny what you actually have said.Originally Posted by ifmd95
Even so. Do ESFp's really seem more serious than merry?
What has quadras anything to do with MBTI?Originally Posted by ifmd95
That doesn't answer the question at all.Originally Posted by ifmd95
What makes what I said supposedly "indirect". The rest what you say is just nonsense again.Originally Posted by ifmd95
Like I said: If that was the case, also ISFj's and ENTj's would be ESFp's duals.Originally Posted by ifmd95
No wonder you are so terribly lost.
The latter part was an extra sentence part of something I was about to write, but decided to remove entirely. I removed that sentence already, right after I posted the message.Originally Posted by ifmd95
Do you have any idea what push-and-pull is? How do I elaborate that banana isn't a dog?
That has any relevance to anything we are talking about? Get a clue.Originally Posted by ifmd95
lol. Maybe you just shouldn't use the word hypothesis at all, if you want to be taken even remotely seriously.Originally Posted by ifmd95
Or maybe she isn't so stupid, that she would desperately keep on going, after she finds out that she has been wrong. Apparently that doesn't stop other people from doing that.Originally Posted by ifmd95
Phaedrus is Phaedrus. I'm not him.Originally Posted by ifmd95
You make lot of pointless maybes. Maybe she had cramp on her fingers, and couldn't type. Maybe the MIB blanked her mind. Or maybe she would have said it, if there wasn't anything else.Originally Posted by ifmd95
None of that has anything to do with, what you claimed first.
Go ask the ENFj's From my point of view they do. And from the description of ENFj's seems like they do.Originally Posted by ifmd95
How is that "emotional analysis", or even remotely point out to feeler? It was based on past experiences with women.
I don't follow you around and look at what people you have typed. I don't know what you typed him as. Or who the "others" were. Maybe someone else just foolish as you said "I agree", and you took that as your big typing victory. Mister T's type might actually be a big suprise, depending how much you know about him. First impression of him is very different from what he is really like.Originally Posted by ifmd95
What example you are now talking about?Originally Posted by ifmd95
Your reply doesn't seem to have nothing to do with what I said.
What's the point in giving you emperical evidence. When you are just going dismiss it just as an emperical evidenceOriginally Posted by ifmd95
The context was that you can tell apart being factual from written instances of facts.Originally Posted by ifmd95
Conclusion: Overall you are now just trying retort with something... anything. It's becoming desperate and sad from your part.