Quote Originally Posted by hitta
If two different types have similarities they have to share a common function. Thats what the concept of function is, differences in behavior. If all the functions were the same they wouldn't be so different would they. So take an ENTp, ENTps value originality. Also, take an INFp, they value originality. How could you possibly say that these two types don't share a link when they both value the same thing. They HAVE to value the same function. It HAS to be this way. If you can't see this, then I am wasting my time. This is the fundamental idea behind all of my ideas. You can't say, while using logic, that two different functions behave the same way. This wouldn't make sense.
sounds wrong. can't originality take different forms? can't various functions support (or at the very least, not contradict) the essential qualities which define originality?