The problem is, maritsa, you've yet to prove that your methodologies are conclusive to ID type. Why is it so hard for you to understand that?
I have looked around. And there is nothing. I've even googled your name, and there is very little. Remember, the onus is on YOU to prove your methodologies. You're methodologies are full of shit, and you are too proud to admit it. You'd much rather go down with your ship, than admit you are wrong. And, this is all really funny because, for all of the VI you've done so far on this site, you've backtracked on your initial type ID. It's obvious, it's not even clear for you.That's very clear stuff...it needs no explaination...I am working on a bigger study now and hopefully will have results of it soon but in the meanwhile, learn to VI. Shame on you for not looking around...