Originally Posted by
exsomnis
On balance, this should be Ji. Dynamic Ip are fundamentally more flexible than static Ij.
There could be something here at function six.. An SLE, not wishing to be seen as an evil person, might have learnt to say the sensitive thing; an ILI, foreseeing drama, might have learnt to do the right thing. Still, in neither case can it be termed moral, foundational, nor customary, because a cool-headed process has preceded it. There are people in the world who are actually good, and kind, and there may be a philosophical component at work such as in the case of INFx types, yet their behaviours are still unforced, perhaps even innate.
Note the frequency; it's hardly the typical mode...
So while the original post was cheeky and amusing, I think the HA notion has been extrapolated too far, to the point where forumites have thought a hands-on, wilful, improvisational approach might be Se agenda, forgetting that Ni/Ne in LIE constantly runs eventuality scenarios and prepares itself by having already mentally run through long if/then chains. A number of older 'LIE' forumites are probably SLE, just for instance (the ones typing LIE 8; believing in systems which weren’t designed to fit together 'modifying' the essential components of one another requires too many unnecessary assumptions)
Alternatively it's conceivable for HA behaviour to manifest in omissions (omitting demand for diligence and consistency (Fi>Ti) in ILI can protect Ti polr), absences (absence of recrimination (Ti>Fi) in IEI can protect Fi polr), negative behaviours of various types which encourage the dual's creative function to flourish, thus supplying the system with the needed element indirectly. Understandably negative behaviours are a bit complex and more difficult to trace
Still, awkward + socially compelled/required can be role function; very strong pattern behaviour can be base or unhealthy programme (8th function)... how people who read this post early on untangled these three from HA is anyone's guess, though it seems they weren't necessarily clear on things themselves