well?
well?
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
not terribly, though you've got me sufficiently confused about your type that i'm not prepared to rule it out.
I don't know anymore. You've changed so much in your quest to discover yourself and your type... I can't tell what's really "you" and what you're just trying on for size.
Please don't take that as criticism. I definitely don't intend it to be. I think it's good to explore type possibilities and challenge different areas of yourself to find your strengths, weaknesses, likes, dislikes, needs, and what you can do for yourself.
ya, thats probably a part of it.Originally Posted by Joy
I agreeOriginally Posted by niffweed17
However (and this is just me, ok?):
I cannot see an ESTj spending this much time on a type quest.
Desperately needing "the truth" is Ti to me.
I do not see an Ni PoLR.
From my perspective you have been rigid and judgmental recently (since you started being ESTj). And Te has nothing to do with being rigid, so it cannot be that you are of a different subtype.
When you feel people are in a bad situation because of bad decision, you don't seem to have any sympathy. To me, that is very non-Delta. ESTjs try to
avoid making mistakes more than other Delta members, but they don't judge others like you do. ESTjs are a lot more relaxed and open than the general stereotype suggests.
And fwiw, you do not look ESTj one bit. ESTjs do tend to smile in photographs. You look like an introvert, for sure.
There just is no ESTj or even Delta vibe coming from you. But again, that's just me.
I still think ISTj. I can see you with an ENFj because she would tell you to lighten up (no offense).
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
LIE's would do the same though.I can see you with an ENFj because she would tell you to lighten up (no offense).
er, to clarify... no one in their right mind would tell an ESI to "lighten up" and expect a favorable outcome
LIE's are good at helping ESI's relax, and vice versa.
qftOriginally Posted by Joy
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
I have a hard time seeing LIE as my dual, but I will consider it.Originally Posted by Joy
I could much more easily see ENFj as my dual, but, we'll see. I do not very much seem merry.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Join da mu'er fu'in club sistah, yo!Originally Posted by Joy
JW, do you know what I think? I think you're a big fat 3w4.
Why do you think that, Ezra?
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
why do you keep changing your name?
Because he thinks too goddamn much.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
NOBODY CAN BE GAMMA BUT JOY, PETTER AND KELLY.
And people wonder why I don't take socionics seriously. It may have some use, but it fails on this board. Perhaps if I were Russian I would see the less hypocritical side of this psychology.
But as it is -- it appears to be a game of musical chairs.
khamelionOriginally Posted by LokiVanguard
who said that?Originally Posted by Garmonbozia
Who's 'who'? Is Garmonbozia 'who'?Originally Posted by Joy
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
To whom was that addressed?Originally Posted by Subterranean
To who it was addressed.Originally Posted by LokiVanguard
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
Drat, your right. It is the subject. Spank.
There wasn't anything wrong with your grammar , I was just saying that my questions were addressed at 'who'. Whoever that maybe.
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
Are you sure? Damn... I'm always so self-conscious about my writing abilities. Ah well. I'm a much better speaker anywho =D
And I think Garmonstd was speaking to the board at large.
who's on first, so he can't take your calls right now? come back tomorrow?Originally Posted by Subterranean
That comedy bit is very hard to do...
some people from my school dressed up as abbott and costello for halloween and did a fairly good job of it.Originally Posted by LokiVanguard
Yeah one of my housemates did it and completely butchered it. My congrats goes out to your mates.
I like to end any confusing discussions by yelling the phrase "THIRD BASE!"
it works for me
Originally Posted by Bionicgoat
Because you care too much. Take a step back, and don't think. Just do.Originally Posted by JTDW
Take a joke :wink:Originally Posted by Joy
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
.
You think creative Se as opposed to demonstrative?Originally Posted by Thunder
I agree that it's more likely, solely because I've seen no evidence to suggest that your Se is demonstrative.
However, I would be prepared to regard JW's Se as neither creative nor demonstrative, as I've not actually seen any evidence for it at all. Perhaps it's because it's in his Super-Ego or -Id.
Poor Gilly, forever forced decipher my bad sense of humor.Originally Posted by Gilly
is that floquet de neu the albino gorilla?Originally Posted by Garmonbozia
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei