lolOriginally Posted by Gilly
Sorry, I just don't get how you can blatantly attack someone and then expect them to know that you meant it as a joke. You got me! Congrats!
lolSorry, I just don't get how you can blatantly attack someone and then expect them to know that you meant it as a joke. You got me! Congrats!
lolMuch ado about shit.
George's vitriolic responses here have been humorous, to say the least. What's the point in learning so much about Socionics just to get offended by what is a very minor (and obvious) case of functional values clashing? It's no big deal. So when this brand of dilemma arises in the future, I suggest we just call it what it is and not waste our time bickering. We should examine this kind of issue with an air of scientific detachment, and not of infantile emotional involvement.
That said, I'll agree that I can be too distant and cold with people on occasion, but this being a big deal or something to become distraught over is nonsense. It's just a quirk, get over it. Grow some
If you're not aiming to offend, what the hell are you wasting your time on?
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Those bolded bits were aimed at the entire discussion, not just at what you wrote, Mr. Ego.
*mumbles...effin fi thread*
ILE
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
I see only one name...you expected me not to react?
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Reply With Quote
