Page 57 of 57 FirstFirst ... 7475354555657
Results 2,241 to 2,253 of 2253

Thread: Examples of Socionics Alpha types

  1. #2241
    What's the purpose of SEI? Tallmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Finland
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    4,188
    Mentioned
    307 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fiorale View Post
    Those soccer moms would disagree with you. Keeping up with the appearance would drive traditional ESE women working to exhaustion. And Si is not just about tradition, but also keeping up with what's expected of them: if she has been living in an environment where she's expected by everyone to work 24 hours to make money and (very importantly) to please/service fans, she would do it, not thinking about how much real benefit/growth she could extract from these activities (which a real Ni type would think about).

    Another thing is though she had controversial relations with other celebrities, she's always been a sweetheart, a good girl to her fans (a consistent Si image). An Ni type would either not be able to maintain that image, or role play that image in a somewhat unnatural way.
    I think you have misunderstood Si. You are actually talking about Fe and Fe+Se in ESE can lead to the behaviour you mention.

    Si is just about comfort, sensing inner physiological phenomena, impressions etc. In ESE you can see a sensual attitude, focus on the body and aesthetics. It's not very pronounced, though.
    The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.

    (Jung on Si)

  2. #2242

    Join Date
    Jun 2022
    TIM
    SLI
    Posts
    1,447
    Mentioned
    81 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fiorale View Post
    Keeping up with the appearance would drive traditional ESE women working to exhaustion. And Si is not just about tradition, but also keeping up with what's expected of them
    The relation of tradition and expectations to Si specifically is nonsense which has no theoretical basis. Introverted Sensing is about the subjective evaluation of sense impressions: physical aesthetics, pleasure, pain, comfort etc. To have valued Si means to, on average, care more about physical comfort than material control. To have strong S means to feel your physical state well. Si types are thus the least prone to exhausting themselves with work - breaking our backs for some future goal or expectation does not motivate us much.

    To do what's expected of you - as in, to do what you have promised - connects with rationality and strong functions. If ESE is pressed by the environment to become a physicist or engineer, you may see more problems with them to do what is expected.

    f she has been living in an environment where she's expected by everyone to work 24 hours to make money and (very importantly) to please/service fans, she would do it
    Rationals may be more steadfast to do what is needed. But such an environment would be hard for a Si type with no more motivation than ''what is expected''.

    not thinking about how much real benefit/growth she could extract from these activities
    Real benefit is evaluated by all functions, not just Ni. Benefit from the point of view of Si is mainly what is physically pleasant now, not in some future fantasy.

    Evaluation of the relation of the energy spent on work to the monetary gain gotten is T. To see alternatives is N. So ESE can have problems to understand how efficient her work is, how she could get more by optimizing the work process, new ways to work/jobs to do.

    she's always been a sweetheart, a good girl to her fans (a consistent Si image).
    What you relate to Si here is related to F. To be sweet, emotionally pleasant. And Taylor Swift looks like a T type, excluding Delta ST. So no ego Si there.

    @Tallmo
    It's not very pronounced, though.
    All strong functions are pronounced, especially the valued ones. The 2nd function is only slightly less pronounced than the 1st. In overt behaviour 2nd valued may even be more pronounced than 1st non-valued.

  3. #2243

    Join Date
    Jun 2024
    Posts
    71
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tallmo View Post
    Si is just about comfort, sensing inner physiological phenomena, impressions etc. In ESE you can see a sensual attitude, focus on the body and aesthetics. It's not very pronounced, though.
    Sure.

  4. #2244

    Join Date
    Jun 2024
    Posts
    71
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nifl View Post
    If ESE is pressed by the environment to become a physicist or engineer, you may see more problems with them to do what is expected...
    Rationals may be more steadfast to do what is needed. But such an environment would be hard for a Si type with no more motivation than ''what is expected''.
    Let me summarize the gist of what you are saying:

    1. You think ESE is not likely to work hard (because it's not physically comfortable). Not likely to work efficiently.
    2. You feel Taylor is a gamma NT

    I know CS Joseph used to type her as NiTe (now he changed it to SeFi). I'm guessing that's probably part of the reason you are giving this typing?

    I cannot change what you believe, except to offer my observations:

    1. Si types can work very hard (LSE is one of the hardest working types. SEI is one of the most tenacious.)
    2. ESEs may not work in an efficient way. But with many professional's help (they are good at getting people), they can be very productive. Being a pop star is not at all like being an engineer.
    3. Though his theory is okay, CS Joseph has many mistypes (his Ne-Si type method often miss important Se-Ni marks, and often cannot tell valued Se V.S. non-valued Se)

  5. #2245

    Join Date
    Jun 2022
    TIM
    SLI
    Posts
    1,447
    Mentioned
    81 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fiorale View Post
    You think ESE is not likely to work hard (because it's not physically comfortable). Not likely to work efficiently.
    ESE may work hard like all others, but are less likely to do so to exhaustion, when it's not needed. It's perceived as more important for Si types to eat, sleep etc. enough than other types.
    To evaluate the efficiency of their work is not the strong side of ESE. But if they're directly influencing people through emotions like singing, then such evaluations can be less necessary, as it's mainly for a strong function for them and demands less thinking.

    You feel Taylor is a gamma NT
    I feel that she is a T type and has no ego Si, not necessarily Gamma NT. Can also be Alpha, Beta T. Leaning towards Ti.

    I know CS Joseph used to type her as NiTe (now he changed it to SeFi). I'm guessing that's probably part of the reason you are giving this typing?
    I'm not familiar with any CS Joseph. I will deny SEE, but not ILI.
    My opinion is based on my perception of her facial expressions and non-verbal mannerisms. Her gaze is cold, not warm or pathetic like F types' expressions often are.

    1. Si types can work very hard (LSE is one of the hardest working types. SEI is one of the most tenacious.)
    All types can work hard. It's easier to be motivated to it by valued functions, easier to do work in strong functions. Si types are just less likely to forgo feeling physically good for work.
    Rationals work more steadily, and extraverts seem to have higher activity levels, but LSE are not one of the most hard working types. They prefer to work reasonably, efficienty, but not like mules. And about the tenaciousness of SEI... irrationals easier jump from a task if it annoys them to do it. And with superego Ni promises of future reward are difficult to trust in. SEI may even get economic problems from this, as they do not have the T to be reasonable with resources.

    But with many professional's help (they are good at getting people), they can be very productive.
    Yes, as all F types they are more skilled with people. They are more productive with people, where processual efficiency and calculations are not on their minds.

    You need practical experience to understand the types, besides reading something like Filatova to get the basics. Your LSE may have been many SLE, LSI, for example. Your SEI - SEE, ESI.

  6. #2246

    Join Date
    Jun 2024
    Posts
    71
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Gaze: her gaze looks normal to me in real life. If you refer to her gaze in music videos...that's acting

    Quote Originally Posted by nifl View Post
    but LSE are not one of the most hard working types. They prefer to work reasonably, efficienty, but not like mules.
    I have no problem with you typing her as any type you wish. Just curious, exactly which type do you feel usually works unreasonably, inefficiently, like mules?

  7. #2247
    Ikite iru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,657
    Mentioned
    268 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    with the ridiculous fanbase and almost cult-like following that Taylor Swift has and the almost universal praise that fans give to her I find it almost impossible to see her as a logical type. many people in eastern europe type her LSI and I do wonder what Fe is when it isn't visible in Taylor Swift because she easily entertains gigantic crowds of people. With the imaginary aspects of her personality, I can only really imagine her to be Beta NF, although I think she is not as talented as most people think.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  8. #2248
    The riddle of will godslave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Location
    Southern France
    TIM
    694 sp/sx
    Posts
    2,689
    Mentioned
    127 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ikite iru View Post
    with the ridiculous fanbase and almost cult-like following that Taylor Swift has and the almost universal praise that fans give to her I find it almost impossible to see her as a logical type. many people in eastern europe type her LSI and I do wonder what Fe is when it isn't visible in Taylor Swift because she easily entertains gigantic crowds of people. With the imaginary aspects of her personality, I can only really imagine her to be Beta NF, although I think she is not as talented as most people think.
    Let's face it, most people don't know how to type.
    Last edited by godslave; 06-12-2024 at 01:25 AM. Reason: deleted 98 % of the post... Because I'm godslave...

  9. #2249
    Not sensitive! SacredKnowing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    TIM
    ILE-H
    Posts
    560
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fiorale View Post
    Taylor Swift - Blank Space


    Taylor Swift - Style


    Both are ESE fantasies, but the atmosphere of music and video changes with the types of the boyfriend.

    First boyfriend is SEE, so the video is gamma-like (in which she plays ESI). Second boyfriend is SLE, so the video is beta-like (in which she plays EIE). Real gamma and beta productions tend to show more grit and less prettiness/extremes compared to alpha fantasies

    Among all types, I find xSEs are the most versatile in acting.
    Every Taylor Swift breakup song is about how SEE is her quasi-identical.

    I think a German ESL student would rewrite the second part of the copula as "about how SEE her quasi-identical is." In some possible world.
    Last edited by SacredKnowing; 06-12-2024 at 03:16 AM. Reason: German
    [Today 03:36 AM] anotherperson: this forum feels like the edge of the internet

  10. #2250
    Ikite iru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,657
    Mentioned
    268 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by godslave View Post
    Let's face it, most people don't know how to type.
    I think what happens is that one well-known socionist ends up typing someone and then most people end up thinking "well that probably makes sense" and then it spreads across the community.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  11. #2251

    Join Date
    Jun 2024
    Posts
    71
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Larry David & Jeff Get Confronted | Curb Your Enthusiasm


    Larry and Jeff: ILE and SEI partner in crime, not meeting ESI's moral standard.



    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Curb Your Enthusiasm S7E02


    Larry and Leon: ILE and SLE Fi polring getting in each other's way

  12. #2252
    Seed my wickedness The Reality Denialist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    8,312
    Mentioned
    349 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Denis Noble LII colliding with causal deterministic views as in instruction set is not the whole.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org

  13. #2253

    Join Date
    Jun 2024
    Posts
    71
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    [#GreatEscape] Compilation of Shindong's Sensible Acts! �� | #Official_Cut | #Diggle



    How to tell the difference between LSI V.S. LII?

    LSI is always cool, even when they are from a traditionally nerdy field like science and research.

    LII is always nerdy, even when they are from a traditionally cool field like being an idol in a Korean boy band. They will also end up being the smartest guy in an escape room show.

Page 57 of 57 FirstFirst ... 7475354555657

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •