Quote Originally Posted by ApeironStella View Post


Been a fence of ILI or LII for her for a while as I was watching her videos, but most likely LII. That shows up more when it comes to her videos on atheism usually, as she tries to go more for the ideas other side presents than the person, and she really doesn't give as much PoLR Fe vibe? Probably a more well rounded LII when it comes to social norms than usual type descriptions, but her insecurity over knowing what really is moral or not often shows up in "I do see your point too, so I don't really want to be so harsh.../I don't claim to have a moral authority on this subject, but that just doesn't sound right to me?" vibe unless it is something like child abuse, something she feels fairly strongly about and certain that it is something she morally opposes completely.

At this point, honestly one of few atheist side of the youtube channels I can tolerate (with Mr. Atheist, who I would assume could be ILE as well? Ne base for sure, and there is a good deal of "They are lovely people, but this idea is absolute horseshit" vibe with him too. Kinda has TMI problem, though generally pretty friendly and likes joking around, even if half of his jokes can easily can cross some moral line and get awkward responses.)
While I don't know what her type is, any reasonable person would attack the idea rather than the person. To do otherwise would be to commit an ad hominem fallacy which does nothing to support your own argument. If you're trying to come across as credible, such a fallacy is a no-no. That doesn't help to determine whether she's an ILI or an LII. I do agree that I don't see Fe PoLR. Based on the few clips I've seen, I don't suspect INTx at all; but I've only seen a few clips.