[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OpUpwg1FU4[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBM-llEnzyU[/youtube]
A bunch more here: http://www.youtube.com/user/ramcnw
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OpUpwg1FU4[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBM-llEnzyU[/youtube]
A bunch more here: http://www.youtube.com/user/ramcnw
ENTj?
ESFp-Fi sub
6w7 sx/so/sp
I know there is one Blake fan on the forum, right?
You definitely give off an ENXp vibe, heh. Infantile
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
You think I am an infantile type? I knew that ...Originally Posted by Courage
You sound a lot different that I expected you to. I'm really not sure what I expected though.
Originally Posted by Joy
I would say ENFp > ENTp, and I can't really see ENTj.
$3.50 for a hot chocolate? That sounds expensive .
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
[web:a38f2f6b43]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Blake[/web:a38f2f6b43]
^ As seen in video, I take it.
I don't know your type but actually I kind of like your walking around videos.
Seems to exude the kind of curiosity it would take to 'discover' an ISTp
ENFp > ENTp, as it stands.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
i still say EII.
I agree.Originally Posted by niffweed17
EII > IEE
INTp
sx/sp
Thanks, I was too lazy to look that up ...
Originally Posted by Elro
ENFp >>>>>> INFj
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
why?Originally Posted by Kim
Are INFjs usually unintentional flirts with the opposite sex?Originally Posted by niffweed17
i wouldn't give something like that any consideration at all.Originally Posted by rmcnew
From my understanding being an unintentional flirt is characteristic of ENFps and not INFjs so much. I just talk to girls and sound like I am flirting.
i think enfp as well. he is obviously an extravert. he has great social ease, and focuses on people around him easily. and even when people make ill-informed comments about his deeply held interests he laughs it off, whereas an introvert would either become nervous, or try to explain the subject to the other person.
asd
i want some more of these videos by forum members. they're really quite informative.
@ reuben -- you remind me slightly of the INFj in one of these other mbti "video posts" on youtube. i believe he was INFj under both systems.
I believe EII as well... Reminds me very much of an EII prof. I know.
INFjs just think too highly of their ethical-ness to consent that they are engaging in flirting - receiving or leading other people on.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
So long as he's infantile.Originally Posted by Mea
I suppose I can see him as EII, but IEE seems more playful in general, and that is what I see from him right now.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
The videos helped to confirm the correctness of my typing of you. The ENFp hypothesis is now strongly corroborated. No other type is nearly as likely.
definitely the mellow interaction style - >> . Ok, I have to admit that Ti dominants can seem just as low on , but I still don't think you're in Fe quadra. Too emotionally involved in the world to be INTj, because INTjs seem to have the calm monk zen attitude "hummmmmm.... Not bothered by anything...", but you have an attitude about what surrounds you and you express it often and casually. The way you express it reminds me of delta NFs much more than betas. When betas would say, "Oh WOW! COOOoool!", you actually just seemed to say "oh wow. cool.".
EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
E3 (probably 3w4)
Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!
Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/
It's funny at the beginning of the second video when you were like "ow" quietly, signifying you'd bumped into something or stubbed your foot or something like that. A true tribute to intuition.
I've always said INFj, and I still do.
But it is never too late to stop doing that. Now when you can see and hear that he is most likely ENFp, it would be irrational to insist on INFj.Originally Posted by discojoe
I guess you are unfamiliar with INFj-Ne.Originally Posted by Phaedrus
It's not clear, AT ALL, that he is most likely ENFp. It's ironic that all the time you spend in your room thinking about Socionics is a total waste.Originally Posted by Phaedrus
Now now ... no need to fight over my type ... theres plenty of my type for everyone.
I have typed you as ISTP a long time ago. I still stand by that.
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
hahahahOriginally Posted by Kristiina
I actually think that points more to an introverted type, and my God do delta NFs seem (to me overwhelmingly) emotionally involved with their surrounding world. My best friend who is INFj, just everything her whole world is emotionally connected to her. It astounds me. Btw I rememeber that some people here say that creative Fi looks like Fe. So maybe that means something in context of evaluating an Fi type.
I think overall McNew our admin, is ENFp > ENTp and I would say ENFp > INFj but something about his body type is really throwing me off. Maybe you could post one where someone is filming you from afar, McNew.
Based on my interactions with mcnew, I think EII is more likely. Based on the videos, I can sort of see IEE, too. So I have no idea.
I agree with DiscoJoe on this... I've watched the videos a few times now, and believe that EII is the most likely type... Don't have time right now to write about it at length, unfortunately.
Do you think an IEE would be more expressive?
Yeah, expressive is a good word for it, Joy.
Less constrained and more theatrical.
And a lot "lighter".
ENFps perhaps because they tend to be a bit more externally expressive. But I agree with you that it is a problem that affects both types. Friendliness and building interpersonal bonds gets interpreted as flirting.Originally Posted by rmcnew
Oh, to find you in dreams - mixing prior, analog, and never-beens... facts slip and turn and change with little lucidity. except the strong, permeating reality of emotion.
Yeap.Originally Posted by Joy
Anyway, unintentional flirt. I have to agree that ENFps can be like that. But what makes you think that all other types can't do the same?
I do not insist that mcnew is not ENFp. But I simply see INFj as a higher possibility.
Or perhaps mcnew can explain why he thinks he's ENFp.
INTp
sx/sp