-
I can't even think about functions 5-8. They seem pretty esoteric and not all that well defined.
How's this for a theory about whom to turn to when trying to strengthen fourth function weaknesses:
A person with an area of primary first function strength will be less adept at teaching this strength since it comes naturally. A person with the area as a second function would be best, since greater practice and development has gone into that area.
What does everybody think?
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules