This poll, of course, is based on the types that people believe themselves to be at present.
This poll, of course, is based on the types that people believe themselves to be at present.
Hmmm. Most likely look-a-like, then mirror.
INTp
sx/sp
mirror
btw, this thread is primarily designed to find out how well people here understand the theory
Put supervisor by accident. Should've put requester
Sigh.
Sorry for fucking up your poll, Joy.
It's not that... it's this issue with varying terminology.
Oh yeah, where did you get all your terms from? Why don't you use the socionics.us ones? In fact, more pertinently, why is there a variation at all?
I don't know where any of the terminology originally came from, but I was using the terminology for intertype relations listed on the16types.info and socionics.com before I knew of the terminology used on socionics.us.Originally Posted by Ezra
These questions are hard to answer because no one's seriously suggested another type for me, except you, Joy, and that wasn't really a suggestion for another type but an idea that I wasn't INFj. And I, myself, after making the move from MBTI, have never really questioned my type. Everything fits as fine as one could expect. So it's hard to give any type of reaction to a suggestion as to my type except curiosity.
And, yeah, I don't like the differing terminology, either. Just another confusing element to it all.
Oh, to find you in dreams - mixing prior, analog, and never-beens... facts slip and turn and change with little lucidity. except the strong, permeating reality of emotion.
Look-a-like for me .
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
look a like.
any of quasi/contrary/lookalike.
how can you agree when you don't even know your own type?Originally Posted by Ezra
IEI - the nasty kind...
Why do people assume I don't know my own type? I do have some idea, and always have done. For example, I'm clearly not Fi or Ni leading. No one on this forum has ever claimed that I am an EII (save one person, who was wrong according to both Courage and Phaedrus), ESI (except FDG, and others, jokingly), ILI or IEI. I don't think I'm Si or Ti leading. I know I value Si to some extent though. It is quite a large part of my life actually for some reason; making myself comfortable. Even if it means making myself uncomfortable, it still might be to make myself comfortable. If I decide that I want to toughen myself up, by putting myself through pain, I am gaining comfort from the fact that it is useful to me. People say I value Ti, but I just make up systems and make outlandish statements for the fun of it. My views aren't really that well organised like a Ti leading. Fe or Ne leading is highly unlikely. I don't have the explicit emotional expression of a Fe leading, nor the power of emotional manipulation. I'm too connected and down-to-earth; practical and realistic to be Ne leading. I can only be Te or Se realistically speaking. I am edging towards Te.Originally Posted by little red riding hood
Anyway, from deductive reasoning, my next type must be Quasi. I can only see myself as either an SLE, LSE or LIE. Since I think it highly unlikey that I have Si PoLR, I am probably SLE or LSE. Therefore whichever one I am, the next likely type will be Quasi.
Lookalike or quasi. (my father or my mother, LOL)
IEI-Fe 4w3
I already gave you this but I'll stick it in here:
anndelise: heh, my mind went around in circles
anndelise: it was like....well, the only other possible option is another nfp, but that would put me as infp and that would put it as Ni Fe and neither of those are options..Ne Fi are the only ones that make any sense
anndelise: but the only option there is INFj....and that doesn't make any sense either
anndelise: the only T type that is interesting to me is Te, but that would mean Si or Ni...and I suck at both
anndelise: so...what..NeTe? nah, NeFiTe
IEE 649 sx/sp cp
Funny that everyone is mentioning quasi because I know I voted quasi and there's only 1 vote for it.... : )
Suomea
i voted mirror but lookalike comes in second.
ILE
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
I have no idea.
"Arnie is strong, rightfully angry and wants to kill somebody."
martin_g_karlsson
I don't think it matters what type one is to answer the question...Originally Posted by little red riding hood
no clue.
EII
I'll tell you what
there is plenty wrong with me
but I fixed up a few old buildings
and I've planted a few trees.
dual after that probably my activity
ESFp-Fi sub
6w7 sx/so/sp
would anyone want to be their conflict??
ESFp-Fi sub
6w7 sx/so/sp
no.
EII
I'll tell you what
there is plenty wrong with me
but I fixed up a few old buildings
and I've planted a few trees.