Discussion of Gulenko's Cognitive Styles

[squark]

The part I was specifically taking issue with was with attributing summing-up with HP as that better fits positivism. As in I think this example should be flipped:

LII: *reads long article written by LSI* [summarizes in 2 sentences]

By following the reasoning CD can converge the various angles in HP to a singular conclusion like VS can, but with a different method. VS takes the gestalt, and CD uses deduction to arrive there.

But yes, I agree the bull and simplified model is a good representation of HP. Explaining that model to others though is where they can get wordy.