But I don't think that contradicts anything that I've written since the reference to Pablo Picasso's "Bull" describes perfectly what you've written about Gulenko's cognition wherein he has an idea which he then fleshes out. It's hollowed out, like a hologram. And the part I wrote about how people can shift between different styles of cognition. The example I posted wasn't a neat summary either. That's why it conflicts with C-D cognition because C-D cognition is about cause-and-effect relationships where each individual link plays an integral role in the overall understanding of the subject matter. C-D cognition = evolutionary: "they think procedurally without overlooking parts and intermediate details." So it's the anti-thesis to H-P cognition, from my understanding.



Hence why H-P creates the framework and V-S weaves through the framework. That's what I wrote in my last post. So we're in agreement there, too.