Quote Originally Posted by Diana
Quote Originally Posted by tcaudilllg
Quote Originally Posted by Ms. Kensington
I thought it would be good to have a thread about this topic. I think now that subtypes can have a significant affect on a relation.

Please place examples and discussion here.

I have seen a smoother relationship with ENTjs who are logical subtype rather than intuitive. I think this does have to do with my preference for Ne (and corresponding discomfort with Se, which I would assume the intuitive subtype ENTj puts more emphasis on than the thinking subtype).

I have also seen significant difference in my relationships with different subtypes of my mirror, the ENTp. Also, INFp.

I have seen less extreme but noticeable differences with the different subtypes of ESFj, ISFp, and ISTp.

On one level this can seem extremely obvious but on another not so simple. One question I have been having is that in the case of extreme subtypes, do you think one class of relation can become "better" than another or do you think you must trek around looking for a dual with as an extreme subtype as you? Would the subtypes need to match or be opposite?
...That's it.

You moron, you are interpreting crosstype information as subtype information. Idiot.

If you want an answer to this question, see the crosstype theory and start typing RIGHT.
Hey now, no reason to insult msk! That's right, everyone else is wrong, and only you're right. As far as I've seen you haven't ever clearly explained yourself or why you believe crosstypes are a more reasonable explanation than subtypes.
Shut up Diana. That's an order from one liberal to another.

And you will stand with me in support of the crosstype theory. You are acting foolish by feigning ignorance of it. Or are you not a liberal?

I warn that any who dare attempt to render all my hard work against adversity for nought will pay dearly for their transgression. This is fate and you cannot change it. I will succeed.