Quote Originally Posted by Loki
Quote Originally Posted by Expat
Quote Originally Posted by XoX
Doesn't reduced usage of Fe naturally lead to increased usage of Ti? As they are the opposite ends of same "axis". Like Se and Ni, Te and Fi, Ne and Si?

Edit:
So INFp (Ni), compared to average INFp should have...
increased usage of Ni, decreased usage of Se
decreased usage of Fe, increased usage of Ti
decreased usage of Fi (because Ti shuts down Fi), increased usage of Te
decreased usage of Si (because Ni shuts down Si), increased usage of Ne
I'm not sure about this. I don't think that less Fe necessarily leads to more Ti. I think it leads to more Te. Now if you say that more Ti leads to more Te -- no, I don't think so.

Se and Ni, Te and Fi, Ne and Si go together as quadra values. They complement each other. So an ENTp uses Ne and Si, but their use of Si is shaky, so they like the ISFp's help on that. But I would argue that what "damages" their use of Si is not their Ne as such, but their Ni.
maybe...

more Ni/less Fe (than avg IEI) => less Si, more Te
(more Ni) => less Se
(less Si) => more Ne
Ti, Fi unchanged
Yes for the first tree deduction.

Ti/Fi: if Ti is counterpart of Fe and Fi is counterpart of Te, then more Fi less Ti (Ti still prominent but less so than an INFp-Fe)