SEI's are softer and more outwardly friendly/jovial.
SEI's are softer and more outwardly friendly/jovial.
Ask Kam
Hello, my name is Bee. Pleased to meet you .
She is right. I am ISFp, and my mother is ISFj.
I enjoy making and hearing a lot of jokes. My mother never has made a joke and she laughs about normal everyday happenings, while I laugh at things that are more far-out and unreal. That is the Ne PoLR in action. Random(me) vs. Static/Normal(her) I am more smiley and jovial than her. I rarely yell about anything, but if I do, I scream and just get furious. My mother enjoys to raise her voice if she is challenged in any way.
She hates to discuss sex, homosexuality, or anything like that because discussing such topics out loud is just "bad". I see no problem with it, because sex and homosexuality are real topics. Very very very moralistic woman, she isn't afraid to voice her opinion on issues of morality. I have seen a lot of Fi PoLR from ILE's and I know my mother would lay the smackdown on them if she heard them. I'm more accepting of people overall also. I will make friends with everyone, my mother chooses her friends very very cautiously.
Anything else, I'm here. I know my mom very well.
D-SEI 9w1
This is me and my dual being scientific together
Thanks guys! You have all painted a better picture / "feel" for the differences, it has helped, and I think I understand who is what now - explains a few things! Thank you all muchly
ENTp... love it
3w2
It is an Fi thing to be choosy about people. It has nothing to do with acceptance of others it's about depth
This being selfish and self involved is what I mean by less compassionate
Yes I can be exacting over some things. When someone tells me that they want a relationship with me but hints at just having sex with me there's no consistency and it's a lie so I will get upset and want to know what exactly do they want. I want moral and emotional consistency and for that I will be exacting in that I will ask which does he want. I may seem strict about my wants and needs but only because I know which line I walk on and want to walk on forever. I won't respond until an inconsistency arises (when somethings are said and indicated that go against my values). In that case I only want clarify things "tell me what it is that you want so that I may decide if the relationship is worth it or move on" I want things set in the beginning and not ambiguous and this allows me to seek and have stability which is essencial for my emotional wellbeing. So yes I demand an answer and my demand of a yes/no decide what you want may seem exacting.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 09-16-2016 at 06:14 PM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
You are quite selective in taking aspects from both types and then coming to a conclusion. My rebuttal:
http://mavericksocionics.blogspot.nl...ld-digger.html
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
Under no exaggeration, Diana's description of ESI is so much like my mom that I never noticed she was mocking me.
It is a very good profile of a middle aged ESI, one with 3 kids, all born after 35.
D-SEI 9w1
This is me and my dual being scientific together
I think Joy has the right idea; she simply hasn't explained it clearly enough.
Essentially, what people have completely missed is the fact that ESIs and SEIs are in opposing quadras. ESIs value the exact opposite of what SEIs value. They are as good as each other at the same things (Se, Si, Fe and Fi); they merely value completely different things.
Some people like this style of explanation. Others prefer it if you "just give me the differences in real-life terms - no theoretical crap". If you like the former, ask me (or Joy or Expat or anyone else who follows this style of reasoning) more about the differences and I'd/we'd be glad to tell you. If you like the latter, just carry on what you're doing; you'll get plenty of responses.
The main difference between ISFps and ISFjs is that the former jump out at me whereas I never seem to notice the latter.
Oh, you wanted something objective? Whoops, sorry!
SLI/ISTp -- Te subtype
Pam (SEI) vs. Angela (ESI) from The Office (US Version)
But most ESIs are no where near as rigid and mean as Angela is, so don't get the wrong idea. This show, in my estimation, really contrasts the Alpha Values (Michael, Jim, Pam) with Gamma Values (Dwight, Angela, Jan)
JRiddy
—————King of Socionics—————
Ne-ENTp 7w8 sx/so