Compilation of Duality Descriptions by Meged and Ovcharov

[Ave]

You find those accurate, as in tested ?

I find them useful. Maybe not as complete as they could be, but still good because they describe alot of points that are true(at least for the description of my duality).

[Absurd]

I find them useful. Maybe not as complete as they could be, but still good because they describe alot of points that are true(at least for the description of my duality).

I can see myself in the mirror reading one of those, that's why the question. Yup, they're of use, I concur.

[The Ineffable]

I can see myself in the mirror reading one of those, that's why the question. Yup, they're of use, I concur.

Namely Craftsman + Psychologist?

[Suz]

I find that the IEE/SLI description rings true in my experience. Like Typhon suggested, doesn't capture ALL the fine nuances, but a really good summary. I actually dont disagree with anything there.

[Absurd]

Namely Craftsman + Psychologist?

No, I'm really sorry.

[Suz]

Namely Craftsman + Psychologist?

No, I'm really sorry.

lol