_
_
Last edited by ifmd95; 01-21-2011 at 01:38 AM.
so what you're saying is...
what a reduntant thing to postthe dots symbolize that the parent forum's name and the intentions of the author are redundant.
uh..i was redundant once. twice if you include looking at it with time going in the reverse direction.
So please explain what it has to do with "What's my Type"?
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
and for the record I was the one who suggested it be moved
(it already seems to be a "rag on Expat day" I don't want to add to his misery )
BTW what's you type?
Ah okay. Fine. I got you now.Originally Posted by ifmd95
No more information?
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
Originally Posted by ifmd95
I like this one. No fuggin idea, though.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
.
I Fuck Mistreated Dogs?
Sorry; Michael Vick on the brain.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Only 100? Pssshhh... Joy has 10,000 already and still refuses to be typed. [edit/// that was a guess... and it was under! It's more like 14,000 now ]Originally Posted by ifmd95
People visit this forum for entertianment (<-- the truth).
.
.
i thought it was an anagram of IMFOriginally Posted by ifmd95
I think your're INTp-Ni anyway
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
My first impression was NF. More in the Delta side (ENFp/INFj) than Beta (ENFj/INFp). However your suggestion of INTp-Ni is very interesting.Originally Posted by FDG
I think krae himself was convinced of being INFp.Originally Posted by Diana
So how about Beta NFs then? ENFj/INFp?Originally Posted by ifmd95
I need to see more to know more. Your self analysis is a bit confusing to me so it isn't that helpful. You need to come up with something new. The analysis above is too "high up there" to be really useful to me.
You might want to evaluate what are your Quadra values.
Do you value Se over Si or the other way around?
Do you value Fe over Fi or the other way around? (you were suggesting Fe>Fi preference earlier)
Do you value Te over Ti or the other way around? (from what I've seen you seem Ti > Te)
Do you value Ne over Ni or the other way around (This is a bit hard to tell really. I can't tell at all atm. You were "mildly" suggesting Ne > Ni)
Do you have an opinion on your temperament? (EJ, IJ, EP, IP)
I'd still say NF (based on initial vibe) or INTj (based on more recent developments). Let's stick with that for a while. You must have some kind of idea in your mind? Something which helps us to cut off some types with great certainty.
I have some problems seeing you as ISTp. You could be negativist and narrator so I guess INTp is possible. It wasn't my first impression though. NF or INTx then.Originally Posted by ifmd95
So is there a particular reason to rule out one of ENFp, INFj, ENFj, INFp, INTj, INTp? For example you are hesitant to see Fi in your ego-block. That would leave us ENFj, INFp, INTj, INTp. Perhaps you don't have enough "fire" to be Fe-dominant (especially as you see Fe-PoLR type as an option).
That leaves INFp, INTj, INTp. Ok I narrowed it down this far. Is there any particular reason you are not one of these types?
I'm going to say INTp for now. And I'm not going to read all your posts to verify that. I read only those which I happen to bump into.
yeah totallyOriginally Posted by Diana
ILE
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
haahhahhaaOriginally Posted by ifmd95
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
ifmd95. It is not really possible to type you with any certainty because you are more or less acting like a troll. I'm not sure if you are revealing really any information useful in typing. I assume that is your purpose. So are you someone who used to be around but left the board for reason or another? Like eh..krae himself or some other socionics corpse?
take a look at his posts in the gamma quadra subforumOriginally Posted by XoX
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
"INTP IMO"
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
I wrote a longish answer and I thought I posted it too but for some reason it is not here One of the points was (again) that you are consciously resisting being typed (at least it seems so). You could be anyone e.g. someone from the board (e.g. Gilligan, Transigent, some other ENTp...). So where are we...first impression NF, then I switched to INTp (via a path which contained INTj) and now I'm also considering ENTp. Umm. Did I miss something?
Edit:
Oh about my own type. I'm not too convinced about that stuff in my sig but latest experiences suggest that way And those are the only rules I have been able to figure out with any certainty yet. I still don't even know if I'm extrovert or introvert
Oh. I didn't know this was that serious. Take all the time you likeOriginally Posted by ifmd95
Ah ok. Sorry about that. I take your word on that. It is just that some others (usually ENTps, ENFp, ENFjs) have previously done fake nicks and tried to lure people into thinking they were real people and so on just out of boredom and to show that they can pull it off. So I get suspicious when it seems like someone is being kind of confrontational and sort of evading certain kind of questions.i do appreciate all your other input though XoX. but suggesting these hidden motives and whatnot.. i'm not a veteran poster incognito,
I will add ENTj to the mix just because your answer reminds me of Expat's answer when I suggested he has hidden motives and because the "backoff a little and have some patience" could be a sign of Ni. And generally Fi quadra types are more offended about that kind of suggestions.
Ok. I think I have suggested enough types for you.
no... the sig line always is the same no matter where or when you posted it. However you can turn off the sig going into your posts in the user profile... in that case any new posts won't have a sig (but old ones you posted when sig was turned on will still have the sig)Originally Posted by ifmd95
no if I change sasquatch to abominable snowman all of my posts- past, present, and future- will have abominable snowman.Originally Posted by ifmd95
exactlyOriginally Posted by ifmd95
if you do it like this...Originally Posted by ifmd95
it will look like this...Code:[url=http://the16types.info/forums/viewtopic.php?t=13403]Please come type me in this thread![/url]
Please come type me in this thread!
which would probably work better (feel free to change the text to whatever you want)
Originally Posted by XoX
These are good observations. I think Gamma makes sense.Originally Posted by XoX
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
the style reminds me of mine, but he seems more scientific and sure of himself.
i'd say ILI - Te
whenever the dog and i see each other we both stop where we are. we regard each other with a mixture of sadness and suspicion and then we feign indifference.
Jerry, The Zoo Story by Edward Albee
What's all this about kitten misuse?Originally Posted by ifmd95
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
I also, if you do not mind, sort of consider you my rival debate partner as it always seems to me that you are arguing the other position that I am arguing.Originally Posted by ifmd95
BTW, what was your Ayn Rand typing? Was it ENFj? I was debating Rand's logic she uses in Objectivism, and her type was not my focus.
Johari Box"Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
Lingering doubts, error, and uncertainty are common aspects of as a base function.Originally Posted by hkkmr
Not wanting to put people, thoughts, and ideas into a grand discrete structure usually associated with a PoLR.
I might be able to see how an PoLR might not be very adamant in expressing their considerations for their own type or making known their conclusions. But I think this has more to do with having a as a 8th function rather than as a PoLR. However, this is a sketchy connection and isn't demonstrated(pardon the pun) significantly by evidence.
PoLR
Suggestive Function
Regular Double-shot Espresso Subtype
Just because I'm a thinking type doesn't mean I'm not an idiot.
Yeah, its wrong to say "refusal to be typed = evidence of PoLR". Its all inter-related but that assertion is just an incorrect interpretation of what is. There is other evidence to suggest you as being an IxTp, some dealing with perhaps how ifmd95 is communicating his/her/it/andro's/G_d's validation of Socionics on this board, but that specific reason is not one of them.Originally Posted by ifmd95
PoLR
Suggestive Function
Regular Double-shot Espresso Subtype
Just because I'm a thinking type doesn't mean I'm not an idiot.
Well done in that thread and the INTp turned Nietzsche thread by the way. And I do appreciate your economists views, as economists often have their own sort of that is quite entertainingly straightforward and well structured.Originally Posted by ifmd95
Johari Box"Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi