Offensive descriptions of types

[Rocky]

Summary of the thread in case everyone doesn't want to read through the whole thing...

So there might still be some hope for you. Maybe you will put all the pieces together some day.

HAHA. You are hilarious.

It's hopeless.

This is definitely up there as one of the most blatant logical pwnages that has ever occurred on this forum.

Phaedrus makes my dual seeking bang its head against the wall in despair. I wonder what it means in socionics terms.

You're just embarrasing yourself at this point.

That was fun.

[Phaedrus]

That was fun.

Yes, we are having a lot of fun on this forum, aren't we?

[Expat]

We are, but you shouldn't be.

[Expat]

As illustration of this --

Phaedrus a few days ago:

The relationships are the socionics types

No, they are not. That seems to be a widespread delusion, but I am slightly surprised that you haven't seen through it.

And now in this thread:

The criteria for disinguishing intertype relations, for example, were not invented before but after Augusta had identified the types in the first place. First the types, then the intertype relations.

Rubbish. She did not identify the types and then noticed, "hmm, these people seem to interact differently". She started seeing the types due to the difference in intertype relationships. She noticed that two couples of apparently very similar people could have extremely different relationships, so she deduced that at least two of those people were very similar superficially but very different internally, which she later called quasi-identicals. Only because she noticed the difference between duality and conflict did she start thinking about types at all. And that's why her types - Socionics types - were built around relationships, and can't exist without them.
.

What's interesting is that Phaedrus seems to regard being called "deluded" - as when people say he's wrong about his type - as some sort of mortal offense, yet he has no problem suggesting that everyone else is - especially when he's wrong.

Having some fun, indeed.