Hmm...almost like I've seen you before. Your picture that is. I'd say ILI or LII (INTp or INTj). Let's pick one......LII / INTj but might be the other way around too.
ILI by VI, but posting about yourself will be more reliable.
ISTp possible.
“I think, therefore I'll think" - Ayn Rand (ESTp, UR GUARDIAN ANGEL)
Looks IxTp.
INTp
sx/sp
I am 99,9% sure I have seen hitta before...I'm having a major deja vu
I don't agree with just VI. I think it'd be better if you posted some stuff about yourself. But lacking that information, I agree with Mea, IxTp
hahahahahahahha hitta
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Don't take the piss, FDG, some people like to have names that mean something in Scandinavian.
Putting you faith in VI is going down Ganin's route. hitta, provide us with a description of yourself.
The best I can come up with is ISTp.
describe yourself please.
EII
I'll tell you what
there is plenty wrong with me
but I fixed up a few old buildings
and I've planted a few trees.
[web:17a97f943e]http://s184.photobucket.com/albums/x182/americaisfascist7/?action=view¤t=101_0454.flv[/web:17a97f943e]
It's not for his name, but I already know him from the socionics chat, and he has an history for being a complete jackassOriginally Posted by Ezra
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Ah yes that's it! The chat! I have seen his pics in the chat like a year ago. I remember he was quite eccentric. I thought it was in some other forum or something.Originally Posted by FDG
For fuck sake, hitta, what part of DESCRIBE YOURSELF do you not understand? People don't operate with VI; it's an illogical method. If you're into that kind of thing, talk to Sergei, I'm sure he'd be happy to type you. Posting more pictures of yourself is not describing yourself.
He reminds me of this comedian Matt Berry (who in this clip plays an actor called Todd Rivers, who plays a character called Lucien Sanchez ) - I think he is prolly INFp. He also looks a bit like Eddie Izzard, face shape + lip wise - (in the vid, hitta looks like he's being drinking cherryade or has some lipstick or something, which maybe why I think that...but I'm just throwing stuff around as usual ).
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ht0zyIJ75Hc&mode=related&search=[/youtube]
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
Eddie Izzard is some funny shitOriginally Posted by Subterranean
you are far too reasonable to be the same type as gilly.Originally Posted by Ezra
You look ST to me, hitta - maybe Delta, maybe even ISTp.
You look mildly depressed in your pictures though, and that kind of throws off V.I. (quenches the spirit, so to speak). I have found it easiest to recognize people's types when they are their most "animated" selves.
everybody vogue, but mostly hitta.
asd
Well, I did try to say I was more than anything else, but people thought this was incorrect.Originally Posted by niffweed17
Alternatively, he is not .
i don't buy that at all. if not, the only other conceivable option isOriginally Posted by Ezra
Illogical ... to be employed by those for whom physical observation skills of fine details as well as motional patterns may not be their strong suit (i.e., not well developed). That's all.Originally Posted by Ezra
Right, so he is definitely . Therefore, I can't be . Is that your point?Originally Posted by niffweed17
I don't understand. What's your point?Originally Posted by astralsilky
I'm pretty sure he/she is saying that it is illogical for those without strong physical observation skills and ability to read body language to use VI.Originally Posted by Ezra
I see. (s)he's insulting me for being inept in physical observation and being able to read body language.Originally Posted by Bionicgoat
No, astralsilky, VI method is illogical regardless of from which angle you attempt to look at it.
Jeez don't be so touchy... I think it was meant as a statement of opinion not a personal attackOriginally Posted by Ezra
wow... seriously, rethink that. first of all, it's a very dubious suggestion that something like "observation of motional patterns" is related to sensory functions, and moreso to suggest that inferior sensory functions are completely incapable of performing these functions (actually, if you look at what certain russian socionists claim; weak functions are perfectly capable of doing this, but only strong functions dictate a "program" of interests).Originally Posted by astralsilky
socionics and similar typologies are not all-encompassing. people can do things well even if they don't have particular dominant functions. to put it one way more relevant to this case, there's a reason why the enneagram type 5 is called the observer.
Originally Posted by Ezra
you think far too literally.
No, I think logically.Originally Posted by niffweed17
this is suggesting LII > ILE.
is this a viewpoint that an EP type is likely to champion?
My best friend is an LII. I am not LII.
I've always thought of myself as INTj
Perhaps you'd like to provide a description of yourself, and not of INTj. I have a recently-type INTj friend, and I'll be able to draw parallels if only you give to this hungry, hungry forum fresh meat i.e. a description of yourself.Originally Posted by hitta
Originally Posted by Ezra
with all due respect, please shut up and stop assuming your omniscience.
Fuck you. I'm telling him what he needs to do. It doesn't make a difference who says it.Originally Posted by niffweed17
Do I look INTj?