Results 1 to 36 of 36

Thread: Most misunderstood socionics type?

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    TIM
    EII-Fi
    Posts
    65
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think ILIs. They're often in their own heads and come off as very emotionless and closed off despite usually being harmless. They definitely try to connect to others (Fi hidden agenda and all), but they aren't the best at explaining their feelings, thus they may be misread easily.

  2. #2
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,952
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Claudius View Post
    I think ILIs. They're often in their own heads and come off as very emotionless and closed off despite usually being harmless. They definitely try to connect to others (Fi hidden agenda and all), but they aren't the best at explaining their feelings, thus they may be misread easily.
    The main problem that they really have is Fe- as PolR, this desire to tell other people straight facts to their face. They are almost creative in their way of easily becoming hated in a group. Life is irrational and people are often driven by emotions no matter their type.the good think about that type is that they won't play games with you. What you see is what you get
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  3. #3
    May look like an LxI, but -Te Metaphor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2021
    Location
    SEA
    TIM
    Te-ILI-N/D SO/sp 5w6
    Posts
    769
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Eh, I mean, if you want to know whether someone is an ILI or not, you should've noticed which person who has the most negative impression...
    Well, this isn't due to their inability to communicate, but rather that they don't want to be liked by anyone who they deem as fake.
    Typology Diagnostic Service

    Typology Discord Server


    Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: "The history of the world is none other than the progress of the consciousness of freedom."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •