Stratiyevskaya used this statement in her description of LIE’s Fe value and it made me raise an eyebrow.
“He[ESI] values good humor and jokes, charges all with his joviality and optimism, loves to tell anecdotes. Due to these qualities, Jack soothes and relaxes his eternally guarded dual, Dreiser.”
If the ESI is FE ignoring, why would an ESI care about these traits?
From experience, yes, I am soothed by LIE’s presence but I wouldn’t attribute it to their agreeable and friendly nature. In fact, when LIE behaves in this manner, it makes me lethargic and I lose interest in conversing with them.
As should be expected from a Fe ignoring individual when faced with Fe function. I would attribute LIE being able to lower ESI’s guard to their Te function.
I had an old classmate that noted once I appeared ‘calm’ around an LIE coworker. Her observation wasn’t wrong, but it would be wrong from a socionics view for another to say it was his Fe function that manifested as “one of us” smile and ‘joviality’ that relaxed me. Instead it was the way that if our boss gave us a task without clear instructions, different to our daily responsibilities, he would turn to me and start delegating who was doing what and how to get it done. I wouldn’t even get a chance to start thinking the worrying thoughts of “where do I start? Can I even do this?” that makes me all tense and guarded. If one of the work’s procedures messed up before a sense of panic could settle in me, he was already sharing a solution.
But let’s consider that duals do react positively to each other's roles, at least in the way Stratiyevskaya suggests. Then LIE should find ease in ESI’s Ti role.
From my perspective, I haven’t seen LIE enjoy my Ti role, in fact, they look disinterested or bored. But I obviously wouldn’t fully know their feelings about this.
Am I wrong?
Do LIE enjoy ESI’s role? Do other ESI enjoy LIE’s Fe role? Or is this just an inconsistency/oversight written by Stratiyevskaya?