I will say I’m skeptical of the Si and Te seeking
I can’t verbalize the two well at all but I am sort beginning to wonder about
The only thing stopping me from typing iei there is mental/vital.. I am not asking that others type me eii in western, especially without a shadow model.
Braingel Today, 04:38 AMI named myself this as a half joke and a half truth. I will be a spiritual luminary to humanity with my visions and will bring about societal healing
Braingel Today, 04:29 AMI mean I don't know if I have ever seen Ni defined without the dimension of time in scionics as thats crucial to it
everything else is vague
I am conscious of my attraction and repulsion to objects and relations with this mean, and try and get closer towards others (Fi+/expansion).. And Ne
Braingel Today, 04:23 AMwhat about Fi and Ne then
necrosebud Today, 04:13 AMThe biggest distinction would be the mental and vital track, where some functions are conscious and others aren’t.. I wouldn’t be a conscious
Braingel Today, 04:08 AMI mean I can understand where you might be coming with the EII for yourself
I don't really agree with the cognition/behavior distinction
skimming the SCS descriptions the essence of the functions were the same as what I got from reading other socionics lit tbh
necrosebud Today, 03:58 AM
Why I switched to mostly SCS added with my own takes for socionics, and a general ethic about typology
Hm, Se in scs has do with scientific thinking, physically apparent traits and their nuanced detail and with volition. And also, an EII has this as mental,
Braingel Today, 05:01 AM