[Okay, I read that article (note that the author began by defining the term "collapse" in that context) until point 2 but then I got bored so
godslave Today, 10:12 PMit's pretty much impossible to imagine that in a specific sense (at least for me). for example, I don't think that human population will peacefully go
Ikite iru Today, 09:06 PMYou seemed to be arguing that Socionics has greater descriptive and explanatory power than the Big Five, yet at the same time, you say it's not capable
Enters Laughing Today, 09:00 PMFair enough ! Before reading that article (I've only read the title) may I ask you, what does civilization collapsing means to you ? I mean what would
godslave Today, 08:31 PMI think many people that are suggesting nuclear energy are very unaware how extremly expensive it is, not even to mention the waste. I don't see it as
Ikite iru Today, 08:15 PMThere's some overlap between this and my old post from another thread:
qaz00 Today, 08:06 PMIndeed. Like you I like to see stuff on a grand scale. That said What about nuclear energy ? Anyways, this is interesting :
I’d be Sx/So and Se-subtype. My ideal self is just me with charm and zero inhibitions
Averroes Today, 07:07 PMI mean the problem that we currently have is that society is very different from how humans actually operate due to fossil fuels and I cannot stress that
Ikite iru Today, 06:58 PM
Typology Random Thoughts
Yes.
SacredKnowing Today, 10:13 PM1. Socionics has greater explanatory power than B5.
2. B5 by design is not capable of describing a type.
Where's