I want to agree with you and it would seem really odd for that to happen, but I've been surprised before by other typings I thought weren't really possible,
squishycans2 Today, 08:22 AMConsider that information flow between types it will be tempting to imagine that the flow has an incidence on the development of a type and its "shape".
godslave Today, 08:14 AMThis reminds me. I was wondering about that actually. I can totally see why somebody might suggest that. And I can come off IEI, especially around SLEs.
squishycans2 Today, 07:32 AMI'm getting huge Dwight Schrute vibes lol.
squishycans2 Today, 06:38 AMOmg, how did you find this, lol. This is like the military having a document on how to deal with Zombies - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CONOP_8888
squishycans2 Today, 06:37 AMYeah, agreed. I met two LSEs within the same time period with two very different health levels; one was hardworking and open minded, while the other one
fauxpunk Today, 05:08 AMWell I'm glad it's not just me lol. I really like the set up to the video; it sums up my thoughts on the matter pretty well. Although, it makes me wonder
fauxpunk Today, 05:05 AMSuper interesting. I wonder how different the community would be if dualization wasn't so sensationalized.
Also; heavily agree with the positive
I super agree. I went into socionics with the desire to improve my relationships and I ended up fixating more on how I or others were falling short. Woops
fauxpunk Today, 04:42 AM
Your typing of forum members
Ah well, it's not really that complicated. If somebody is say Ne Fi, dualistically they also use Si and Te. Since we are not robots, you can easily use
squishycans2 Today, 08:28 AM