I think SCS has completely butchered Aushra’s original description of the information elements so I’ll leave it at that https://classicsocionics.wordpress.com/augusta-imes/
necrosebud Today, 05:09 AMHm, Se in scs has do with scientific thinking, physically apparent traits and their nuanced detail and with volition. And also, an EII has this as mental,
Braingel Today, 05:01 AMI will say I’m skeptical of the Si and Te seeking
I can’t verbalize the two well at all but I am sort beginning to wonder about
The only thing stopping me from typing iei there is mental/vital.. I am not asking that others type me eii in western, especially without a shadow model.
Braingel Today, 04:38 AMI named myself this as a half joke and a half truth. I will be a spiritual luminary to humanity with my visions and will bring about societal healing
Braingel Today, 04:29 AMI mean I don't know if I have ever seen Ni defined without the dimension of time in scionics as thats crucial to it
everything else is vague
I am conscious of my attraction and repulsion to objects and relations with this mean, and try and get closer towards others (Fi+/expansion).. And Ne
Braingel Today, 04:23 AMwhat about Fi and Ne then
necrosebud Today, 04:13 AMThe biggest distinction would be the mental and vital track, where some functions are conscious and others aren’t.. I wouldn’t be a conscious
Braingel Today, 04:08 AM
Why I switched to mostly SCS added with my own takes for socionics, and a general ethic about typology
I mean, it isn’t that I take every single thing about scs as accurate, and I have intuited the model rather than studied it vast, I learn through
Braingel Today, 05:16 AM