Does anyone know what the plus minus signs for each IME of every type are, according to Yermak (apparently he has a different system)? Or at least where
loopyclouds Today, 09:49 AMCan you explain first the Idea of morphing what do you mean by that exactly so that I can try to follow your reasoning ? I don't understand the bold part.
godslave Today, 08:53 AMAh well, it's not really that complicated. If somebody is say Ne Fi, dualistically they also use Si and Te. Since we are not robots, you can easily use
squishycans2 Today, 08:28 AMI want to agree with you and it would seem really odd for that to happen, but I've been surprised before by other typings I thought weren't really possible,
squishycans2 Today, 08:22 AMConsider that information flow between types it will be tempting to imagine that the flow has an incidence on the development of a type and its "shape".
godslave Today, 08:14 AMThis reminds me. I was wondering about that actually. I can totally see why somebody might suggest that. And I can come off IEI, especially around SLEs.
squishycans2 Today, 07:32 AMI'm getting huge Dwight Schrute vibes lol.
squishycans2 Today, 06:38 AMOmg, how did you find this, lol. This is like the military having a document on how to deal with Zombies - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CONOP_8888
squishycans2 Today, 06:37 AMYeah, agreed. I met two LSEs within the same time period with two very different health levels; one was hardworking and open minded, while the other one
fauxpunk Today, 05:08 AM
Yermak signs
http://en.socionicasys.org/teorija/d.../funkcii/znaki
godslave Today, 10:00 AM