Well, you have to consider the fact socionics was invented by constipated looking people who kinda analyzed relationships more from the outside looking
Hot Scalding Gayser Today, 06:50 PMXIE and SXE aren’t “dishonest” and someone being interpreted as dishonest doesn’t make them “dishonest”
Also, that would be more enneagram-related
It makes sense, as I gave Todd a Dominant subtype, because some of his expressions and energy reminded me of xIE-Ni and he displays a lot of both Fe and
qaz00 Today, 06:21 PMWell, in SCS, both an IEE and SEE would fixate a lot on Ti. It is a mental super egoic spot in a perfection placement. They’d replace their Ti incompetence
Braingel Today, 05:55 PMThis was supposed to be in my reply to you, but the website had acted up. It even posted it but doesn’t show now: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachmen...8b68f07894a5f&
Braingel Today, 05:43 PMIndeed, ILE and IEE they produce relations between objects.
Source
That said, there is nothing mentioned above
In this model I am working with, there is no such thing as “valued” or “unvalued”; it is only mental/vital. And an EII in this
Braingel Today, 05:18 PMI will make an analogy, from a realization I had before, about how overtime, these systems make building blocks to build the house of the real typology
Braingel Today, 05:11 PMDamn.. this guy is identical to two friends of mine and one youtuber (Lewis Howes - from school of greatness).
I typed my friends EIE and the youtuber
Why I switched to mostly SCS added with my own takes for socionics, and a general ethic about typology
really glad to see someone else warming up to classic socionics
anotherperson Today, 07:56 PMthe W/G stereotypes have really gotten out of hand