In this model I am working with, there is no such thing as “valued” or “unvalued”; it is only mental/vital. And an EII in this
Braingel Today, 05:18 PMI will make an analogy, from a realization I had before, about how overtime, these systems make building blocks to build the house of the real typology
Braingel Today, 05:11 PMDamn.. this guy is identical to two friends of mine and one youtuber (Lewis Howes - from school of greatness).
I typed my friends EIE and the youtuber
I think their logic in saying adherence to structure would go with Ne may have do with not only the internal content going to Ne in this model, but also
Braingel Today, 04:58 PMI think this is just one of many Socionics claims with nothing empirical behind them.
Alternative topic: explain how this is NOT true for
[MENTION=16646]Braingel[/MENTION]
It's probably against the code of conduct for qualified psychologists to publicly classify someone by Socionics
mr provocateur aka Reality Denialist is between 2 types. There is a lot of Fi devaluing but it appears to be ignoring. There is also a lot of Ne in framing
Distance Today, 03:15 PMDon't you want to be a SLE? It seems for me that only people valuing Ti can so seriously discuss the differences between models and "schools"
Kurt Gabin Today, 02:41 PMI was a bit making fun of the idea of knowing what's inside the object (white sphere in my example). Plus the crystal ball is a sphere. Plus that character
godslave Today, 02:24 PM
Why I switched to mostly SCS added with my own takes for socionics, and a general ethic about typology
Indeed, ILE and IEE they produce relations between objects.
godslave Today, 05:32 PMSource
That said, there is nothing mentioned above