Socionics is a theory of information processing and personality type, distinguished by its information model of the psyche, called Model A, and a model of interpersonal relations. It incorporates Carl Jung's work on Psychological Types with Antoni Kępiński's theory of information metabolism. Socionics is a modification of Jung's personality type theory that uses eight psychic functions. These functions process information at varying levels of competency and interact with the corresponding function in other individuals, giving rise to predictable reactions and impressions—a theory of intertype relations.
Socionics was developed in the 1970s and '80s, primarily by the Lithuanian researcher Aušra Augustinavičiūtė, an economist, sociologist, and dean of the Vilnius Pedagogical University's department of family science. A. Augustinavičiūtė has later shortened her last name from "Augustinavichiute" to "Augusta" to make it easier to spell for foreigners. The name "socionics" is derived from the word "society", because A. Augusta believed that each personality type has a distinct purpose in society, which can be described and explained by socionics. Augusta created symbols to represent the functions described by Carl Jung and — together with a circle of fellow researchers/hobbyists — eventually created what is known as the "socionic model of the psyche" — a description of the psyche where each of the 8 information elements has its place in each person's psyche.
The central idea of socionics is that information is intuitively divisible into eight categories, called information aspects or information elements, which a person's psyche processes using eight psychological functions. Each sociotype has a different correspondence between functions and information elements, which results in different ways of perceiving, processing, and producing information. This in turn results in distinct thinking patterns, values, and responses to arguments, all of which are encompassed within socionic type. Socionics' theory of intertype relations is based on the interaction of these functions between types.
Weirdly enough, I am a 4 in most schools— Naranjo, Ichazo, RH, Luckovich, Fauvre, Palmer, etc.. Likely because 4w5 is closer to the classical Naranjo
Braingel Today, 09:43 PMhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3Z9QQLsk28
ah you beta NF's. always willing to let people die for your theoretical ideology
There's no evidence that combinations of Jungian dichotomies increase precision. Rather, the opposite.
Enters Laughing Today, 09:00 PMIt's possible but not really a trend. Maybe you're thinking of SEEs.
Exodus Today, 08:19 PMSo , I'm gonna expand more on Ni especially
But before I start , I remembered something about the questionnaire
Another
[MENTION=22204]SilentFace[/MENTION] I didn't understand what you mean by " black and white " in Fe , is it something like I have strict beliefs
Squirrel Today, 07:11 PMYou can't take a checklist of dichotomies of size 2^N, increase N, and then gain some knowledge. That's relying on the Narcissism of Small Differences
SacredKnowing Today, 06:55 PMI’m very passionate about my beliefs in what constitutes an ideal system and anything that violates the conditions necessary for such a system to
Weenusflytrap Today, 05:34 PM
Thoughts about my type
Not very related but I don't think IEI for Rusal, I think EIE-N
one Today, 10:21 PM