Socionics is a theory of information processing and personality type, distinguished by its information model of the psyche, called Model A, and a model of interpersonal relations. It incorporates Carl Jung's work on Psychological Types with Antoni Kępiński's theory of information metabolism. Socionics is a modification of Jung's personality type theory that uses eight psychic functions. These functions process information at varying levels of competency and interact with the corresponding function in other individuals, giving rise to predictable reactions and impressions—a theory of intertype relations.
Socionics was developed in the 1970s and '80s, primarily by the Lithuanian researcher Aušra Augustinavičiūtė, an economist, sociologist, and dean of the Vilnius Pedagogical University's department of family science. A. Augustinavičiūtė has later shortened her last name from "Augustinavichiute" to "Augusta" to make it easier to spell for foreigners. The name "socionics" is derived from the word "society", because A. Augusta believed that each personality type has a distinct purpose in society, which can be described and explained by socionics. Augusta created symbols to represent the functions described by Carl Jung and — together with a circle of fellow researchers/hobbyists — eventually created what is known as the "socionic model of the psyche" — a description of the psyche where each of the 8 information elements has its place in each person's psyche.
The central idea of socionics is that information is intuitively divisible into eight categories, called information aspects or information elements, which a person's psyche processes using eight psychological functions. Each sociotype has a different correspondence between functions and information elements, which results in different ways of perceiving, processing, and producing information. This in turn results in distinct thinking patterns, values, and responses to arguments, all of which are encompassed within socionic type. Socionics' theory of intertype relations is based on the interaction of these functions between types.
In all of my research, it feels like intertype descriptions are always so negative. In no way do I mean talking about how relationships can struggle is
fauxpunk Yesterday, 11:52 PMHonestly, yes. I think that I oversimplified things a bit back then. I think that I construed Ni to mean time alone, but Ni in itself is a lot more advanced
DEAD Yesterday, 08:08 PMI think what is even worse than correlationism is "bad" correlationism i.e. to justify a typing in a given system by or with another. This would
godslave Yesterday, 07:05 PMTo simply acknowledge that they are underlining similarities. Someone who types as LII sx8, sx2 ILI, or sp8 EII is most definately mistyped.
Muira Yesterday, 06:51 PMI wonder what is the point Typology aficionados want to make in trying to correlate typologies that were not invented to be correlated in the first place.
godslave Yesterday, 06:49 PM
Negative Descriptions
LOL yeah. I guess it’s because duality is held as the ideal/good standard, so descriptions of any other ITR are framed such that they emphasize
loopyclouds Today, 12:40 AM