Socionics is a theory of information processing and personality type, distinguished by its information model of the psyche, called Model A, and a model of interpersonal relations. It incorporates Carl Jung's work on Psychological Types with Antoni Kępiński's theory of information metabolism. Socionics is a modification of Jung's personality type theory that uses eight psychic functions. These functions process information at varying levels of competency and interact with the corresponding function in other individuals, giving rise to predictable reactions and impressions—a theory of intertype relations.
Socionics was developed in the 1970s and '80s, primarily by the Lithuanian researcher Aušra Augustinavičiūtė, an economist, sociologist, and dean of the Vilnius Pedagogical University's department of family science. A. Augustinavičiūtė has later shortened her last name from "Augustinavichiute" to "Augusta" to make it easier to spell for foreigners. The name "socionics" is derived from the word "society", because A. Augusta believed that each personality type has a distinct purpose in society, which can be described and explained by socionics. Augusta created symbols to represent the functions described by Carl Jung and — together with a circle of fellow researchers/hobbyists — eventually created what is known as the "socionic model of the psyche" — a description of the psyche where each of the 8 information elements has its place in each person's psyche.
The central idea of socionics is that information is intuitively divisible into eight categories, called information aspects or information elements, which a person's psyche processes using eight psychological functions. Each sociotype has a different correspondence between functions and information elements, which results in different ways of perceiving, processing, and producing information. This in turn results in distinct thinking patterns, values, and responses to arguments, all of which are encompassed within socionic type. Socionics' theory of intertype relations is based on the interaction of these functions between types.
With the use of RH and other authors, then the application of enneagrams and their socionic counterparts changes somewhat or even drastically sometimes.
Muira Today, 05:05 PMI corrected myself, what i meant is that logical types wouldn't be delusional in terms of ero-mania, especially high dimensional function don't actually
Muira Today, 04:37 PMI mean, this is the normal thing to do
I won't kill you
If there's someone I would like to kill on this forum,
Not all supervisory dynamics are equal.. As a matter of fact, sometimes the supervision is defined as a “guardian angel” dynamic (which I
Braingel Today, 04:33 PMYou’d asked that I give my commentary on some of this.. First of all,
I will say that I don’t just use Naranjo, I use my own synthesis
So maybe the fact we often get better along with our conflict over our supervisor on average. But I actually question, to what extent is getting along
Muira Today, 04:10 PMI think this is one of the most unlikely pairings to form. The SLE, of all types, won't stand for constantly feeling like they're in an "inferior"
loopyclouds Today, 03:54 PMSorry, just saw this comment; my thoughts in italic again ^^°
For the rest of the sections :
Ti and Si were the easiest, but
Typology Random Thoughts
If you can't describe and measure it via a checklist of properties, you don't know it.
Enters Laughing Today, 05:30 PM