Socionics is a theory of information processing and personality type, distinguished by its information model of the psyche, called Model A, and a model of interpersonal relations. It incorporates Carl Jung's work on Psychological Types with Antoni Kępiński's theory of information metabolism. Socionics is a modification of Jung's personality type theory that uses eight psychic functions. These functions process information at varying levels of competency and interact with the corresponding function in other individuals, giving rise to predictable reactions and impressions—a theory of intertype relations.
Socionics was developed in the 1970s and '80s, primarily by the Lithuanian researcher Aušra Augustinavičiūtė, an economist, sociologist, and dean of the Vilnius Pedagogical University's department of family science. A. Augustinavičiūtė has later shortened her last name from "Augustinavichiute" to "Augusta" to make it easier to spell for foreigners. The name "socionics" is derived from the word "society", because A. Augusta believed that each personality type has a distinct purpose in society, which can be described and explained by socionics. Augusta created symbols to represent the functions described by Carl Jung and — together with a circle of fellow researchers/hobbyists — eventually created what is known as the "socionic model of the psyche" — a description of the psyche where each of the 8 information elements has its place in each person's psyche.
The central idea of socionics is that information is intuitively divisible into eight categories, called information aspects or information elements, which a person's psyche processes using eight psychological functions. Each sociotype has a different correspondence between functions and information elements, which results in different ways of perceiving, processing, and producing information. This in turn results in distinct thinking patterns, values, and responses to arguments, all of which are encompassed within socionic type. Socionics' theory of intertype relations is based on the interaction of these functions between types.
LSEs mainly do stay faithful to whomever they are with, but that doesn't mean they don't divorce, or are never forced into a divorce. An LSE is not many
Adam Strange Today, 05:18 AMIME they stay faithful to whoever they are with
wdym by the last part
socionics is just an approximation, wouldn't assume that's who the person is
necrosebud Today, 04:51 AM"Ignoramus with genius problem-solving skills" is an impossible personality.
This is the personality type that the U.S.A. wants
You see, theoretically dualization is supposed to happen partially unconsciously and it requires a closer psychological distance than just the superficial
godslave Today, 04:47 AMI worked with a female EII and a male LSE, both of whom were married to non-duals. The smart EII got a divorce from her stupid husband but was feeling
Adam Strange Today, 04:41 AMI won't stop bringing this up because it matters more than anything else here. Attachment Theory. Do they even know about it, do you know about it, and
End Today, 04:33 AMif they are attracted to you they inappropriately leak it too, so will XLIs but there's more buffer is the best way I can put it
LXEs can
some of them disown their Fi for some reason. I have never had an antagonistic relationship with my Te so idgi
since I am veeeery emotional,
Have you ever liked a dual less after getting to know them more?
Yea.
Lord Pixel Today, 05:46 AMOne LSE I knew was super charismatic at first. We kind of admired each other from a distance. Obviously to me as an introvert I was