Socionics is a theory of information processing and personality type, distinguished by its information model of the psyche, called Model A, and a model of interpersonal relations. It incorporates Carl Jung's work on Psychological Types with Antoni Kępiński's theory of information metabolism. Socionics is a modification of Jung's personality type theory that uses eight psychic functions. These functions process information at varying levels of competency and interact with the corresponding function in other individuals, giving rise to predictable reactions and impressions—a theory of intertype relations.
Socionics was developed in the 1970s and '80s, primarily by the Lithuanian researcher Aušra Augustinavičiūtė, an economist, sociologist, and dean of the Vilnius Pedagogical University's department of family science. A. Augustinavičiūtė has later shortened her last name from "Augustinavichiute" to "Augusta" to make it easier to spell for foreigners. The name "socionics" is derived from the word "society", because A. Augusta believed that each personality type has a distinct purpose in society, which can be described and explained by socionics. Augusta created symbols to represent the functions described by Carl Jung and — together with a circle of fellow researchers/hobbyists — eventually created what is known as the "socionic model of the psyche" — a description of the psyche where each of the 8 information elements has its place in each person's psyche.
The central idea of socionics is that information is intuitively divisible into eight categories, called information aspects or information elements, which a person's psyche processes using eight psychological functions. Each sociotype has a different correspondence between functions and information elements, which results in different ways of perceiving, processing, and producing information. This in turn results in distinct thinking patterns, values, and responses to arguments, all of which are encompassed within socionic type. Socionics' theory of intertype relations is based on the interaction of these functions between types.
Not really, no. Having a dominant instinct doesn't mean successfully meeting that instinctual need. Also, the needs of the Sx instinct has more to do
Ave Today, 01:33 PMIt's just physiognomy but also facial expressions, attitudes, even personal style. These things might not mean much individually taken together it seems
Ave Today, 01:14 PMMaybe try directly expressing your need for more open communication about your thoughts and feelings. It could help bridge the gap and strengthen your
fenix Today, 12:35 PMmaybe, who knows. I'm not a scientist in that field. I do however think that our external appearance influences internal processes and the things we think
Ikite iru Today, 11:47 AMOr maybe physiognomy just doesn't have anything to do with personality.
Northstar Today, 11:43 AMGlad you felt the need to tell everyone how observant you are, must have been an itch that you needed to scratch, some drop of attention you craved. I
Ikite iru Today, 11:35 AMSince everybody on the forum likes to gangbang Alive…. I have yet another criticism for the LII nerd bottom.
I saw that Alex Strangelove
Terrence Howard EIE. Lack of basic education and seems to grasp content in paradoxical ways. Underlying thoughts have some truths beyond the surface,
The Reality Denialist Today, 07:28 AMThe impulse to storm the farm of desire and pleasure in hibernating crystals of the karaoke sensei is mermaid and star
Raptor2016 Today, 05:42 AM
Which types tend to get laid?
People in relationships / promiscuous ppl
one Today, 02:05 PM