Socionics is a theory of information processing and personality type, distinguished by its information model of the psyche, called Model A, and a model of interpersonal relations. It incorporates Carl Jung's work on Psychological Types with Antoni Kępiński's theory of information metabolism. Socionics is a modification of Jung's personality type theory that uses eight psychic functions. These functions process information at varying levels of competency and interact with the corresponding function in other individuals, giving rise to predictable reactions and impressions—a theory of intertype relations.
Socionics was developed in the 1970s and '80s, primarily by the Lithuanian researcher Aušra Augustinavičiūtė, an economist, sociologist, and dean of the Vilnius Pedagogical University's department of family science. A. Augustinavičiūtė has later shortened her last name from "Augustinavichiute" to "Augusta" to make it easier to spell for foreigners. The name "socionics" is derived from the word "society", because A. Augusta believed that each personality type has a distinct purpose in society, which can be described and explained by socionics. Augusta created symbols to represent the functions described by Carl Jung and — together with a circle of fellow researchers/hobbyists — eventually created what is known as the "socionic model of the psyche" — a description of the psyche where each of the 8 information elements has its place in each person's psyche.
The central idea of socionics is that information is intuitively divisible into eight categories, called information aspects or information elements, which a person's psyche processes using eight psychological functions. Each sociotype has a different correspondence between functions and information elements, which results in different ways of perceiving, processing, and producing information. This in turn results in distinct thinking patterns, values, and responses to arguments, all of which are encompassed within socionic type. Socionics' theory of intertype relations is based on the interaction of these functions between types.
I mean even when you understand the personal misunderstanding stuff seemingly you are still concerned about the general phenomenon of X (EIEs being histrionic
necrosebud Today, 06:50 PMThis would be correct. As I said, being social X image combined, makes it extremely hard to not take to heart (pun sort of intended) when I face invalidation
Braingel Today, 06:41 PMIf people were to look outside of Filatova and Model G, and into newly renovated versions of classical socionics (which have far more nuance and are better
Braingel Today, 06:19 PMWould it be a typing war if the person has not self-typed ?
(Personally I would appreciate any opinion, even though I self-typed
It's not really opinions , just wondering how are some people self typed as "this type/subtype/ennneagram etc " while they're far from its main
Squirrel Today, 05:39 PMIn hindsight one of the reasons you seem very invested might be the social instinct sort of going beyond the personal and holding social ideals you feel
necrosebud Today, 05:27 PMA new typology war may start if I express my opinion about some forums' members self typing but I'm a lazy person on holidays
So , have
I'll try to answer the op question.
The suggestive "function" is theoretically an "unconscious" phenomenon happening
Your Type and Traumatic Reactions of your own
I personally believe what I quoted of Naranjo… That a 1D Se INFx who has high sensitivity will turn into a 4 core. (Meaning they’d have an
Braingel Today, 06:58 PM