Socionics is a theory of information processing and personality type, distinguished by its information model of the psyche, called Model A, and a model of interpersonal relations. It incorporates Carl Jung's work on Psychological Types with Antoni Kępiński's theory of information metabolism. Socionics is a modification of Jung's personality type theory that uses eight psychic functions. These functions process information at varying levels of competency and interact with the corresponding function in other individuals, giving rise to predictable reactions and impressions—a theory of intertype relations.
Socionics was developed in the 1970s and '80s, primarily by the Lithuanian researcher Aušra Augustinavičiūtė, an economist, sociologist, and dean of the Vilnius Pedagogical University's department of family science. A. Augustinavičiūtė has later shortened her last name from "Augustinavichiute" to "Augusta" to make it easier to spell for foreigners. The name "socionics" is derived from the word "society", because A. Augusta believed that each personality type has a distinct purpose in society, which can be described and explained by socionics. Augusta created symbols to represent the functions described by Carl Jung and — together with a circle of fellow researchers/hobbyists — eventually created what is known as the "socionic model of the psyche" — a description of the psyche where each of the 8 information elements has its place in each person's psyche.
The central idea of socionics is that information is intuitively divisible into eight categories, called information aspects or information elements, which a person's psyche processes using eight psychological functions. Each sociotype has a different correspondence between functions and information elements, which results in different ways of perceiving, processing, and producing information. This in turn results in distinct thinking patterns, values, and responses to arguments, all of which are encompassed within socionic type. Socionics' theory of intertype relations is based on the interaction of these functions between types.
You can't take a checklist of dichotomies of size 2^N, increase N, and then gain some knowledge. That's relying on the Narcissism of Small Differences
SacredKnowing Today, 06:55 PMI’m very passionate about my beliefs in what constitutes an ideal system and anything that violates the conditions necessary for such a system to
Weenusflytrap Today, 05:34 PMIf you can't describe and measure it via a checklist of properties, you don't know it.
Enters Laughing Today, 05:30 PMWith the use of RH and other authors, then the application of enneagrams and their socionic counterparts changes somewhat or even drastically sometimes.
Muira Today, 05:05 PMI corrected myself, what i meant is that logical types wouldn't be delusional in terms of ero-mania, especially high dimensional function don't actually
Muira Today, 04:37 PMI mean, this is the normal thing to do
I won't kill you
If there's someone I would like to kill on this forum,
Not all supervisory dynamics are equal.. As a matter of fact, sometimes the supervision is defined as a “guardian angel” dynamic (which I
Braingel Today, 04:33 PMYou’d asked that I give my commentary on some of this.. First of all,
I will say that I don’t just use Naranjo, I use my own synthesis
So maybe the fact we often get better along with our conflict over our supervisor on average. But I actually question, to what extent is getting along
Muira Today, 04:10 PM
Thoughts about my type
[MENTION=22204]SilentFace[/MENTION] I didn't understand what you mean by " black and white " in Fe , is it something like I have strict beliefs
Squirrel Today, 07:11 PM