Socionics is a theory of information processing and personality type, distinguished by its information model of the psyche, called Model A, and a model of interpersonal relations. It incorporates Carl Jung's work on Psychological Types with Antoni Kępiński's theory of information metabolism. Socionics is a modification of Jung's personality type theory that uses eight psychic functions. These functions process information at varying levels of competency and interact with the corresponding function in other individuals, giving rise to predictable reactions and impressions—a theory of intertype relations.
Socionics was developed in the 1970s and '80s, primarily by the Lithuanian researcher Aušra Augustinavičiūtė, an economist, sociologist, and dean of the Vilnius Pedagogical University's department of family science. A. Augustinavičiūtė has later shortened her last name from "Augustinavichiute" to "Augusta" to make it easier to spell for foreigners. The name "socionics" is derived from the word "society", because A. Augusta believed that each personality type has a distinct purpose in society, which can be described and explained by socionics. Augusta created symbols to represent the functions described by Carl Jung and — together with a circle of fellow researchers/hobbyists — eventually created what is known as the "socionic model of the psyche" — a description of the psyche where each of the 8 information elements has its place in each person's psyche.
The central idea of socionics is that information is intuitively divisible into eight categories, called information aspects or information elements, which a person's psyche processes using eight psychological functions. Each sociotype has a different correspondence between functions and information elements, which results in different ways of perceiving, processing, and producing information. This in turn results in distinct thinking patterns, values, and responses to arguments, all of which are encompassed within socionic type. Socionics' theory of intertype relations is based on the interaction of these functions between types.
Also Sometimes I act extremely impulsive and I rarely predict the consequences. I am not aware of the danger I will be in anyway. I usually live the moment
unkn0wnus4r Today, 12:11 AMSome parts are relatable but I don't even fully understand Ni function, I can't make a comment I'm having trouble understanding function.
unkn0wnus4r Today, 12:00 AMI'd disagree, again judging from SCS and SSS.
you should mention what socionic model you are using
Sx5 is too emotionally expressive, you'd be sp5 over sx5 especially with 3E, LFEV.
583
I'd recommend you look into ILI, https://augustaproject.wordpress.com/ili-description/
Enneagram type 5 is most strongly associated with Ti, and much less so with Ni. https://thoughtcatalog.com/heidi-pri...nneagram-2/18/
Adam Strange Yesterday, 11:27 PMWhat subtype of e5? Naranjo I presume?
E5 is more congruent to Ni base, sx5 for IEI, sp and so5 for ILI. However some argue for LII/EII.
I've finished video, honestly I'm suck at self expressioning i dont even fit SEE-Fi they seem more extraverted tbh like I dont know how to start conversation,
unkn0wnus4r Yesterday, 11:11 PMThat's the only section done, but feel free to add criticism or direct feed back.
Muira Yesterday, 11:00 PM
Member Questionnaire (unkn0wnus4r)
Hm, what do you think of sx6/sp6? Essentially LSI in correlation.
Muira Today, 12:37 AMThis summarizes classical socionic functions with links to original sources