Socionics is a theory of information processing and personality type, distinguished by its information model of the psyche, called Model A, and a model of interpersonal relations. It incorporates Carl Jung's work on Psychological Types with Antoni Kępiński's theory of information metabolism. Socionics is a modification of Jung's personality type theory that uses eight psychic functions. These functions process information at varying levels of competency and interact with the corresponding function in other individuals, giving rise to predictable reactions and impressions—a theory of intertype relations.
Socionics was developed in the 1970s and '80s, primarily by the Lithuanian researcher Aušra Augustinavičiūtė, an economist, sociologist, and dean of the Vilnius Pedagogical University's department of family science. A. Augustinavičiūtė has later shortened her last name from "Augustinavichiute" to "Augusta" to make it easier to spell for foreigners. The name "socionics" is derived from the word "society", because A. Augusta believed that each personality type has a distinct purpose in society, which can be described and explained by socionics. Augusta created symbols to represent the functions described by Carl Jung and — together with a circle of fellow researchers/hobbyists — eventually created what is known as the "socionic model of the psyche" — a description of the psyche where each of the 8 information elements has its place in each person's psyche.
The central idea of socionics is that information is intuitively divisible into eight categories, called information aspects or information elements, which a person's psyche processes using eight psychological functions. Each sociotype has a different correspondence between functions and information elements, which results in different ways of perceiving, processing, and producing information. This in turn results in distinct thinking patterns, values, and responses to arguments, all of which are encompassed within socionic type. Socionics' theory of intertype relations is based on the interaction of these functions between types.
Well, you have to consider the fact socionics was invented by constipated looking people who kinda analyzed relationships more from the outside looking
Hot Scalding Gayser Today, 06:50 PMXIE and SXE aren’t “dishonest” and someone being interpreted as dishonest doesn’t make them “dishonest”
Also, that would be more enneagram-related
It makes sense, as I gave Todd a Dominant subtype, because some of his expressions and energy reminded me of xIE-Ni and he displays a lot of both Fe and
qaz00 Today, 06:21 PMWell, in SCS, both an IEE and SEE would fixate a lot on Ti. It is a mental super egoic spot in a perfection placement. They’d replace their Ti incompetence
Braingel Today, 05:55 PMThis was supposed to be in my reply to you, but the website had acted up. It even posted it but doesn’t show now: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachmen...8b68f07894a5f&
Braingel Today, 05:43 PMIndeed, ILE and IEE they produce relations between objects.
Source
That said, there is nothing mentioned above
In this model I am working with, there is no such thing as “valued” or “unvalued”; it is only mental/vital. And an EII in this
Braingel Today, 05:18 PMI will make an analogy, from a realization I had before, about how overtime, these systems make building blocks to build the house of the real typology
Braingel Today, 05:11 PMDamn.. this guy is identical to two friends of mine and one youtuber (Lewis Howes - from school of greatness).
I typed my friends EIE and the youtuber
Why I switched to mostly SCS added with my own takes for socionics, and a general ethic about typology
really glad to see someone else warming up to classic socionics
anotherperson Today, 07:56 PMthe W/G stereotypes have really gotten out of hand