Socionics is a theory of information processing and personality type, distinguished by its information model of the psyche, called Model A, and a model of interpersonal relations. It incorporates Carl Jung's work on Psychological Types with Antoni Kępiński's theory of information metabolism. Socionics is a modification of Jung's personality type theory that uses eight psychic functions. These functions process information at varying levels of competency and interact with the corresponding function in other individuals, giving rise to predictable reactions and impressions—a theory of intertype relations.
Socionics was developed in the 1970s and '80s, primarily by the Lithuanian researcher Aušra Augustinavičiūtė, an economist, sociologist, and dean of the Vilnius Pedagogical University's department of family science. A. Augustinavičiūtė has later shortened her last name from "Augustinavichiute" to "Augusta" to make it easier to spell for foreigners. The name "socionics" is derived from the word "society", because A. Augusta believed that each personality type has a distinct purpose in society, which can be described and explained by socionics. Augusta created symbols to represent the functions described by Carl Jung and — together with a circle of fellow researchers/hobbyists — eventually created what is known as the "socionic model of the psyche" — a description of the psyche where each of the 8 information elements has its place in each person's psyche.
The central idea of socionics is that information is intuitively divisible into eight categories, called information aspects or information elements, which a person's psyche processes using eight psychological functions. Each sociotype has a different correspondence between functions and information elements, which results in different ways of perceiving, processing, and producing information. This in turn results in distinct thinking patterns, values, and responses to arguments, all of which are encompassed within socionic type. Socionics' theory of intertype relations is based on the interaction of these functions between types.
We might be similar in some temperament that's unrelated to socionics. Didn't you just have a Cthulhu profile pic? You seem more irrational than me
Ikite iru Today, 11:25 AMYou see me as IEI? And yet I relate to most of what you wrote. Does that make me as Se devaluing? I don't know, I don't think a person wants to "lead"
Ave Today, 11:22 AMI don't know. I have a job that lets me be entirely independent and that's really the only thing I care about. I've never cared about leading others,
Ikite iru Today, 11:18 AMLol, there certainly are better types when it comes to survivial. It's delusional to think that just because all types are useful in some way, they are
Ave Today, 10:37 AMHonestly they usually don't. At least it's not supposed to be conscious unless the person has a D subtype.
Centrality is defined (in SHS)
Hmm not that special I guess. My LSE sister is 15 years older and has pretty much spend her whole life working. I barely see her. Pretty much always involved
Ikite iru Today, 09:32 AM
Gulenko's typings of forum members AKA Big G SquaD
Yep, I changed it because it didn't feel right for some reason.
Ave Today, 11:29 AMI could be irrational, but why do you think so? I'm interested in hearing