Socionics is a theory of information processing and personality type, distinguished by its information model of the psyche, called Model A, and a model of interpersonal relations. It incorporates Carl Jung's work on Psychological Types with Antoni Kępiński's theory of information metabolism. Socionics is a modification of Jung's personality type theory that uses eight psychic functions. These functions process information at varying levels of competency and interact with the corresponding function in other individuals, giving rise to predictable reactions and impressions—a theory of intertype relations.
Socionics was developed in the 1970s and '80s, primarily by the Lithuanian researcher Aušra Augustinavičiūtė, an economist, sociologist, and dean of the Vilnius Pedagogical University's department of family science. A. Augustinavičiūtė has later shortened her last name from "Augustinavichiute" to "Augusta" to make it easier to spell for foreigners. The name "socionics" is derived from the word "society", because A. Augusta believed that each personality type has a distinct purpose in society, which can be described and explained by socionics. Augusta created symbols to represent the functions described by Carl Jung and — together with a circle of fellow researchers/hobbyists — eventually created what is known as the "socionic model of the psyche" — a description of the psyche where each of the 8 information elements has its place in each person's psyche.
The central idea of socionics is that information is intuitively divisible into eight categories, called information aspects or information elements, which a person's psyche processes using eight psychological functions. Each sociotype has a different correspondence between functions and information elements, which results in different ways of perceiving, processing, and producing information. This in turn results in distinct thinking patterns, values, and responses to arguments, all of which are encompassed within socionic type. Socionics' theory of intertype relations is based on the interaction of these functions between types.
I will make an analogy, from a realization I had before, about how overtime, these systems make building blocks to build the house of the real typology
Braingel Today, 05:11 PMDamn.. this guy is identical to two friends of mine and one youtuber (Lewis Howes - from school of greatness).
I typed my friends EIE and the youtuber
I think their logic in saying adherence to structure would go with Ne may have do with not only the internal content going to Ne in this model, but also
Braingel Today, 04:58 PMI think this is just one of many Socionics claims with nothing empirical behind them.
Alternative topic: explain how this is NOT true for
[MENTION=16646]Braingel[/MENTION]
It's probably against the code of conduct for qualified psychologists to publicly classify someone by Socionics
mr provocateur aka Reality Denialist is between 2 types. There is a lot of Fi devaluing but it appears to be ignoring. There is also a lot of Ne in framing
Distance Today, 03:15 PMDon't you want to be a SLE? It seems for me that only people valuing Ti can so seriously discuss the differences between models and "schools"
Kurt Gabin Today, 02:41 PMI was a bit making fun of the idea of knowing what's inside the object (white sphere in my example). Plus the crystal ball is a sphere. Plus that character
godslave Today, 02:24 PMNot triggered per se just wanted to clarify since it’s tone is not evident online, i was not sure I understood the purpose of the crystal ball dimensional
necrosebud Today, 02:13 PM
Why I switched to mostly SCS added with my own takes for socionics, and a general ethic about typology
In this model I am working with, there is no such thing as “valued” or “unvalued”; it is only mental/vital. And an EII in this
Braingel Today, 05:18 PM