.
This describes my Ij temperament quite well.
Likes on your profile: 143
Likes used in estimation: 81
OPENNESS:CONSCIENTIOUSNESS:EXTRAVERSION:AGREEABLEN ESS:STABILITY:
Liberal and artistic rather than conservative and traditional
Well organized versus spontaneous and flexible
Shy and reserved rather than outgoing and active
Warm, trusting and cooperative rather than assertive and competitive
Calm and relaxed as opposed to stressed
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Liberal / Artistic, Spontaneous / Flexible, Shy / Reserved, Assertive / Competitive and Emotional.
All because I listen to Joy Division.
Look at that subtle off-white coloring. The tasteful thickness of it. Oh my God. It even has a watermark.
wow, your results are telling of Ij temperament with Si Alpha value and T type rather than F. Our things in common are Calm and relaxed (Ij), liberal and artistic and shy and reserved (I), but our differences are in Well organized vrs spontaneous and flexible (I value Te over your Fe), and assertive and competitive vrs warm/trusting/cooperative (Alpha values)Originally Posted by Within
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Liberal and Artistic, Well Organized, Shy and Reserved, Calm and Relaxed, Assertive and Competitive.
The trickster is at one and the same time creator and destroyer, giver and negator, he who dupes others, and who is always duped himself.
Analyze it well, Maritsa. William is hiding something. I knew it from the start.
EDIT: By the way - I don't use/have facebook.
Last edited by Absurd; 05-30-2013 at 04:19 PM.
My Fe is nonexistent, and I'm most but shy. Also, I believe myself to be around 90% J. Although, I do find most of the results intriguing. It's quite fascinating how they would differentiate between all of those parameters, even to get a simplistic yet somewhat accurate view.
SEE types also use Te, would you consider them to be well organized instead of spontaneous and flexible?
YOUR OPENNESS
as opposed to
LIBERAL AND
ARTISTIC
CONSERVATIVE AND
TRADITIONAL
82% 18%
YOUR CONSCIENTIOUSNESS
as opposed to
SPONTANEOUS AND
FLEXIBLE
WELL
ORGANIZED
68% 31%
YOUR EXTRAVERSION
as opposed to
SHY AND
RESERVED
OUTGOING AND
ACTIVE
78% 22%
FRIENDS
YOUR AGREEABLENESS
as opposed to
ASSERTIVE AND
COMPETITIVE
WARM, TRUSTING
AND COOPERATIVE
56% 44%
SEE MY
FRIENDS
YOUR NEUROTICISM
as opposed to
CALM AND
RELAXED
EMOTIONAL AND
STRESSED
80% 20%
I can't copy the whole page with my results directly on fb ...but apparently it's a test created by the Cambridge Psychometrics Centre.
I think they should analyze my activity on this forum, too and then state their conclusions.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Seems similar to the big 5. Except computerized and not from self-reporting.
That was interesting.
YOUR OPENNESS
LIBERAL AND ARTISTIC
72%as opposed to
CONSERVATIVE AND TRADITIONAL
28%YOUR CONSCIENTIOUSNESS
WELL ORGANIZED
87%as opposed to
SPONTANEOUS AND FLEXIBLE
13%YOUR EXTRAVERSION
SHY AND RESERVED
91%as opposed to
OUTGOING AND ACTIVE
9%YOUR AGREEABLENESS
WARM, TRUSTING AND COOPERATIVE
97%as opposed to
ASSERTIVE AND COMPETITIVE
3%YOUR NEUROTICISM
CALM AND RELAXED
90%as opposed to
EMOTIONAL AND STRESSED
10%Wow, I wish I was 87% well-organized irl. It takes one look around my room to be proven otherwise.
But I can produce a nice table like the above one if I am sufficiently bored...
I like the "personality twins" suggestions, lol. It actually listed one of my friends that I have the best instinctual rapport with.
I tried it again today since I added some likes recently It only changed by 1 point. How can they tell I am not organized....
YOUR NEUROTICISM as opposed to
EMOTIONAL AND
STRESSED CALM AND
RELAXED
70% 30%
This is my friend's results. She was my opposite. Interesting because I kind of disagree with her on a lot of stuff. Especially political. She was a little different before having kids but I kind of knew she would end up like this. Not sure which socionics type she would fit. Her actions in the past were Beta but she just feels more Delta now. I won't give it a second thought.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Reply With Quote
